d_rawk Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Dude, for better or for worse. We've met, a couple times probably, but it has been years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgnor Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 (edited) So nobody here reads my sarcasm? You really need a font? Edited December 10, 2008 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Let's keep it between the rhubarb and stay on topic Looking forward to the next month and a half to see how the Conservatives are going to react to Ignatieff becoming the new leader...if they even try to launch a smear campaign against him it'll show just how weak of a leader Harper is to Canada...he'll probably never see it but like Dion, he should have stepped down and let another take his place... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 So nobody here reads my sarcasm? You really need a font? No sad faces! This online forum stuff can be pretty limiting at times. If you're not using a winky face or a smiley face or a sad face, your intent can easily be misinterpreted. Especially in a place like a politics forum, where people can be seriously offended, pissed off, or gleeful all in the same thread. It gets confusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AD Posted December 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 wait, dude or chick? that pick up line definitely doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d_rawk Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 a/s/l?:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phishtaper Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 wait' date=' dude or chick? [/quote']that pick up line definitely doesn't work. maybe not in the clubs you go to, AD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradm Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 I caught a bit of the interview with Harper last night, and had a "WTF?" moment when he talked about how he welcomed (or wanted, or left the door open, or something) the opposition to sit down with the government. Huh? Where was the co-operation* before all this crap went down? What things is Harper willing to compromise on (i.e., give up) in the name of getting the government working again? I want Harper to show some real leadership, and actually lead (in person, if necessary, with his underlings walking behind him) his party into discussions with the other parties; waiting for them to come to you isn't leadership, it's slacking.Aloha,Brad* As opposed to co-opteration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Exactly and what I've been saying all along. IMO, all parties need(ed) new leaders as the current onces had failed miserably. The Conservatives are no doubt scrambling and if they continue with their predictable ways there'll be a smear campaign against Ignatieff because they've wasted most of their time trying to make the other parties and coalition idea look bad to Canadians instead of doing their jobs and working with the opposition. I loved this quote: If the Liberals want a model of a profoundly divided party uniting under a flawed leader and going on to steady electoral gains, they need only to look across the aisle at Harper's ruling Conservatives. It's only getting better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothedShredder Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 The Conservatives are no doubt scrambling and if they continue with their predictable ways there'll be a smear campaign against Ignatieff because they've wasted most of their time trying to make the other parties and coalition idea look bad to Canadians instead of doing their jobs and working with the opposition. Smear the smearer's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Smear the smearer's! Nawwww, just "expose" them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Harper & his LIES from AnyoneButHarper.ca on Vimeo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Maybe I should stop picking on Harper but what the hell else is there to do on a Wednesday?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothedShredder Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Yoga? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Yoga? Well, yoga would be less painful than watching Harper videos, and yoga can be pretty painful at times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothedShredder Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 So you're a masochist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
can-o-phish Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 So you're a masochist?Only when I force myself to watch Harper-Media! Rick's Take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothedShredder Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 Damn, I got dial-up, so I haven't really been able to see any of those videos... FWIW... I'm sure they all make really solid points though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaggyBalls Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 This online forum stuff can be pretty limiting at times. If you're not using a winky face or a smiley face or a sad face, your intent can easily be misinterpreted. Especially in a place like a politics forum, where people can be seriously offended, pissed off, or gleeful all in the same thread. It gets confusing.Tell me about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaggyBalls Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 SmoothedShredder Said: Smear the smearer's! Nawwww, just "expose" them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradm Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Has anybody made a joke using the word "prorogies"? I could see Air Farce joining up what Harper did with/to parliament to a food item with potatoes and cheese in it...Aloha,Brad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanada Kev Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 No jokes that I know of. However, I had never heard the term before and when it occurred the other week I heard it referenced the same day. I was watching some episodes of The Tudors season one, and they used the term back then. Parliament was prorogued for 3 YEARS!!! Damn, Harper is so much better than Henry VIII eh? http://books.google.ca/books?id=3YAzWQPwO7oC&pg=PA284&lpg=PA284&dq=prorogue+tudors&source=bl&ots=RRj9Q16zes&sig=VAiFxgWEHRlH76C9gTu-EyFHAso&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPA285,M1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AD Posted December 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Has anybody made a joke using the word "prorogies"? many many people did, two weeks ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanada Kev Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts