I am often dismayed by the attitude that the consumers of energy are more at fault for the way the electricity is being produced when alternative technologies exist and could easily be proliferated worldwide in a few short years. International climate treaties, 'targets' and still no large scale infrastructure spending and alottment for R&D...unless I missed the geothermal electricity plants that could be built anywhere for example (or more specifically, a lack of examples that would shoot down my perspective and lead us to not 'have' (barf) to change to toxic fluorescents to 'save the planet'. Considering that large scale industrial agriculture is far more energy intensive and wasteful than incandescent bulbs, then where's the new law banning potatoes, wheat, and ethanol fuel? I have a couple of full spectrum CFL bulbs from Verilux and I really like them but I still prefer incandescent lights. LEDs flicker and are still expensive. I'll try them but not until they're priced within reach. If we actually move to ban incandescents I'll be buying cases of lightbulbs. I can't buy into the farce that climate change is my fault when there's still a significant demand for electricity outside of residential use. I wonder how much things will change when people start driving electric cars en masse. How much 'fossil fuel' is burned when we do a google search?