I'm referring to the rapturous applause and hollering Dawkins received whenever he responded to one of the Liberty students. It came across to me like, "take that sucker!" Dawkins is a great orator, no doubt, but I don't think he was providing substantive enough answers to warrant that level of support. There was no "slam dunk". That's me though. I also think Dawkin's could have handled the dumb question, "What if you're wrong?" a little more graciously. I don't see the point in being a prick to the group of people he was debating, because then that's all they're going to remember about him.