Siloet Posted March 5, 2004 Report Share Posted March 5, 2004 "Boundaries between instinct and learning do not coincide. We refer to all things 'cultural' as that which is learned. What we learn today is effectively innate received knowledge within society, rather than a power which is symbolically grounded. 'Traditional behaviour' overlaps human and non-human behaviour. The production of artefacts depends on a capacity for symbolic thought. This appears to be unique in homo-sapiens, based on our capacity for language. nevertheless, behavioural 'dialects' exist in animals, particularly in chimpanzees. Our languages allow for innovation by deliberate invention rather than acts of of blind variation. We direct our evolution towards an imagined future Utopia. We practice an active and conscious acquisition of culture (rather than imitative learning) which in turn is responsible for cumulative and progressive growth of knowledge. The consequences of this educational restraint misleads humans into thinking that it underlies everything we do. It underlies only a small (albeit significant) fraction of what we do. In this way, human conduct does not differ from the conduct of non-human animals. Our emancipation from the animal kingdom must be regarded as a freak of nature. The story of Creation favours man and has been passed down and elaborated by the one faculty peculiar to us- language. It is language that has spearheaded our rapid evolution into the position of a selected species, and even in that capacity, our specific cultural concepts have dominated the variations by which we have formed our hierarchical sense of being." -Ralph Steadman This guy is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.