Whitey Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=227516&hubname= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booche Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 The prosecution said scientific evidence showed Ramage had up to four times the legal blood-alcohol limit at the time of the crash, though none of the hundreds of people at an earlier reception could say he had a single drink. The defence claimed blood and urine tests were flawed and that any smell of beer came from cans that exploded in the accident. What about the nurse that treated him and said she didnt smell any booze on him? She also said that when she drew blood from him for the booze test, she inadvertently swapped the cotton ball in alcohol which she wasnt supposed to do. When they did a second test after she realized her mistake, it came up negative.I may have forgotten the exact details but those were two storylines I figured would play a prominent role but obviously not. I thought they had witnesses testify that Ramage did not appear drunk at the scene. At 4 times the legal limit would he not be completely annihilated?I missed something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now