Esau. Posted March 29, 2007 Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 I'm a smoker, but I know if owned a building (townhomes/apt./houses) and rented them out I wouldn't allow smoking, just for the better insurance rates (or breaks) alone, not to mention the lessened risk of fires. Legislation or not if it was my money involved it would be my decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenSeasJim Posted March 29, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 Some more fuel for the fire[color:red]Smokers call in sick more, have poorer performance: studyLast Updated: Thursday, March 29, 2007 | 1:16 PM ETCBC NewsSmokers showed poorer job performance and took more sick days than their non-smoking colleagues, researchers have found.In the current issue of the journal Tobacco Control, researchers tracked the career progression of more than 5,000 women over eight years after they entered the U.S. Navy.Compared with non-smokers, frequent smokers were more likely to: * Quit before serving their full term. * Be discharged early for medical reasons, bad behaviour, or misconduct, including drug misuse. * Show a higher rate of personality disorders.On average, non-smokers were paid significantly more than daily smokers, after taking into account education and time in service.About 45 per cent of the women had never smoked, 27 per cent were daily smokers when they enlisted, and the rest were ex smokers or smoked occasionally.It is not clear if cigarette smoking is directly linked to slacking off."Cigarette smoking might simply be a 'marker' for other underlying factors, such as non-conformity and high risk taking, that contribute to poorer performance in the military," Dr. Terry Conway of San Diego State University's school of public health and his colleagues said.More sick leave for smokersA second study appearing in the same issue found Swedish smokers take nearly eight more days of sick leave per year on average than their non-smoking colleagues.Smoking has been linked to missing work, but the studies often had small samples and did not take into consideration other factors such as socio-economic background.To reduce the risk of measurement errors, Petter Lundborg, an economist at Free University Amsterdam in the Netherlands, used a nationally representative database on sickness-related absences among more than 14,000 workers in Sweden from 1988 to 1991.Among workers aged 16 to 65 with a range of occupations, the average total number of days taken as sick leave was 25.Overall, smokers took the most sick leave, an average of 11 extra days, or more than two weeks of full-time work, compared with non-smokers."The results suggest that policies that reduce and/or prevent smoking may also reduce the number of days of sick leave," Lundborg concluded.The results of both studies suggest smoking cessation policies may increase worker productivity.Since factors other than smoking-related health were related to the higher number of sick days, more research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of stop-smoking campaigns and the societal costs of the habit, Lundborg said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Boy 2.0 Posted March 29, 2007 Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 (edited) my university library had a smoking room which blows me away nowsome guys i knew in highschool used to do knives with bunsen burners during class, while the teacher was present, with kids all aroundahhh memories Edited March 29, 2007 by Guest hacking cough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AD Posted March 29, 2007 Report Share Posted March 29, 2007 I'm a smoker, but I know if owned a building (townhomes/apt./houses) and rented them out I wouldn't allow smoking, just for the better insurance rates (or breaks) alone, not to mention the lessened risk of fires. Legislation or not if it was my money involved it would be my decision.as a landlord you can say that in the lease, but you can only try to enforce it if the tenant's smoking is interfering with another tenant's enjoyment of the premises. The complaint must come from the other tenant.The landlord association is trying to change this section of the landlord tenant act (whatever it's called now) so that it's not a case-by-case enforcement and it can change to a building by building enforcement. Or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now