Big Brother in High School

[Dr_Evil_Mouse]

1984 references tend often enough to be hyperbolic, but this is just freakin' creepy.

US school used webcams to spy on students, lawsuit alleges

Maryclaire Dale

Philadelphia — The Associated Press Published on Friday, Feb. 19, 2010 11:36AM EST Last updated on Friday, Feb. 19, 2010 11:49AM EST

A suburban Philadelphia school district used the webcams in school-issued laptops to spy on students at home, potentially catching them and their families in compromising situations, a family claims in a federal lawsuit.

Lower Merion School District officials said the laptops “contain a security feature intended to track lost, stolen and missing laptops,†and that the feature was deactivated Thursday. Angry students had already responded by putting tape on their laptop cameras and microphones.

Sophomore Tom Halpern described students as “pretty disgusted,†and noted that his class recently read “1984,†the George Orwell classic that coined the term “Big Brother.â€

“This is just bogus,†said Halpern, 15, of Wynnewood, as he left Harriton High School on Thursday with his taped-up computer. “I just think it's really despicable that they have the ability to just watch me all the time.â€

The school district can activate the webcams without students' knowledge or permission, the suit said. Plaintiffs Michael and Holly Robbins suspect the cameras captured students and family members as they undressed and in other embarrassing situations, according to the suit.

Such actions would amount to potentially illegal electronic wiretapping, said Witold J. Walczak, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, which is not involved in the case.

“School officials cannot, any more than police, enter into the home either electronically or physically without an invitation or a warrant,†Walczak said.

A school district statement released late Thursday said the tracking feature would not be reactivated “without express written notification to all students and families.â€

“We can categorically state that we are and have always been committed to protecting the privacy of our students,†said the spokesman, Doug Young.

The affluent district prides itself on its technology initiatives, which include giving Apple laptops to each of the approximately 2,300 students at its two high schools.

“It is no accident that we arrived ahead of the curve; in Lower Merion, our responsibility is to lead,†Superintendent Christopher W. McGinley wrote on the district website. McGinley did not immediately return messages left Thursday by The Associated Press.

The Robbinses said they learned of the alleged webcam images when Lindy Matsko, an assistant principal at Harriton High School, told their son Blake that school officials thought he had engaged in improper behaviour at home. The behaviour was not specified in the suit.

“(Matsko) cited as evidence a photograph from the webcam embedded in minor plaintiff's personal laptop issued by the school district,†the suit states. The behaviour was not specified in the suit, which did not make clear whether the family had seen any photographs captured by school officials.

Matsko later confirmed to Michael Robbins that the school had the ability to activate the webcams remotely, according to the suit, which was filed Tuesday and which seeks class-action status.

The Robbinses declined to speak with an Associated Press reporter at their home Thursday. Their lawyer, Mark S. Haltzman, did not return messages.

The U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the privacy of the home when it ruled in 2001 that police could not, without a warrant, use thermal imaging equipment outside a home to see if heat lamps were being used inside to grow marijuana. Technology or no, Supreme Court precedents draw “a firm line at the entrance to the house,†Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, quoting an earlier case.

“This isn't just them spying on the kids, this is them intruding on the parents' home. Who knows what they are seeing?†Walczak said. “The courts for 80 years have said there's no greater sanctuary than a person's own home.â€

The lawsuit's allegations raise new concerns about school-issued laptops, said an Electronic Freedom Foundation lawyer.

“I've never heard of anything this egregious,†said Kevin Bankston, a senior staff attorney at the San Francisco-based group. “Nobody would have imagined that schools would peer into students private homes and even bedrooms without any kind of justification.

Students like Halpern say they mostly keep their computers in their bedrooms — and rarely turn them off.

“School ends at the end of the school property, so they shouldn't really be in our business at home,†Halpern said.

[SaggyBalls]

Would I be as naked and perverted as I could think to be at home with the thing, smearing mustard and ketchup all over my body, and write hugely flattering poetry about the school superintendent on my chest and lit about a tryst with the principal?

maybe.

But I think I'd have to invite a friend over to write my work on my rear upper thighs without it smudging.

[Dr_Evil_Mouse]

[SaggyBalls]

I'm flattered that you'd even have the imagery there to begin with Big Guy.

[phishtaper]

these school officials are not only creepy, they are incredibly stupid. "yeah, we spied on your 16yo son and saw him wacking it" who would ever admit that?!

[SaggyBalls]

There's admitting it and then there's the special awards and honours that the kids get by 'surprise'.

Another potential reason to be athletic, kids.

I wonder what kind of access they'd have to the FILES on these computers.

[Dr_Evil_Mouse]

School spying scandal gets even more bizarre

The story of the school district that supposedly spied on some students keeps getting odder and odder. While the school district claims that it used the secret remote webcam activation technology 42 times -- and only to track down stolen or lost laptops -- it still hasn't explained why this particular student was punished. He claims his laptop was not stolen and there was no reason to turn it on. The school claims that the assistant principal who supposedly confronted the student with an image from the webcam is being unfairly tarnished.

But here's where it gets even odder. Apparently, the "improper act" that the student was disciplined for was an accusation of either drug use or drug selling. For what? Well, the image showed the student with Mike & Ikes candies, which do have a passing resemblance to pills, but (last we checked) do not appear to be controlled substances.

Now, there certainly could be more to this story, but the school has not done a particularly good job explaining its side of things.

More links in article.

[phishtaper]

ground score!!