Toronto Star: Judge removes all curbs on Homolka

[MarcO]

holy moley!

Judge removes all curbs on Homolka

Nov. 30, 2005. 01:29 PM

CANADIAN PRESS

MONTREAL — Karla Homolka, who served 12 years for the sordid sex slayings of two Ontario schoolgirls, had all court-imposed conditions on her freedom lifted by a judge today.

The ruling by Justice James Brunton of Quebec Superior Court means Homolka – who goes by the name Karla Teale – does not have to report regularly to police, can go where she wants and see who she pleases.

“The possibility that Ms. Teale might reoffend one day cannot be completely eliminated,†Brunton wrote.

“However, her development over the last 12 years demonstrates, on a balance of probabilities, that this is unlikely to occur. She does not represent a real and imminent danger to commit a personal injury offence . . . The appeal should be granted.â€

A number of media initially reported eight of the 14 conditions were struck down but Brunton confirmed that he had voided them all.

Homolka was freed in July after serving a 12-year manslaughter sentence for the sex killings of teenagers Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French in 1990s.

She had been ordered to report regularly to police on her whereabouts and travel plans, among other restrictions.

Lawyers for Homolka were not immediately available for comment.

Joanne Marceau, a spokeswoman for the Quebec Justice Department, said a number of options are being considered, including an appeal and an attempt to seek another set of conditions.

Ontario Conservative justice critic Bob Runciman said he believes the conditions on Homolka were valid.

“From our perspective and the perspective of most Ontarians, we felt the conditions, the restrictions placed on her were reasonable and were justified,†he said in Toronto. “I think it’s going to be of great concern to victims’ families for sure.â€

Runciman criticized the Ontario government for not paying to allow the families of Homolka’s victims to attend the appeal hearing.

“If the families were there, I think it would’ve elevated the issue with respect to the decision being taken by the judge.â€

The restrictions were handed down under Criminal Code provisions after a judge ruled she still posed a risk to the community.

Homolka is believed to be living in the Montreal area.

[Dr_Evil_Mouse]

I just saw this myself. Unbelievable.

[Lazlo]

I'm going to ask her out on a date.

[Dr_Evil_Mouse]

I think she's trying to work on her Madonna look.

[Lazlo]

On second thought.

[Tooly]

unbelievable

[StoneMtn]

Transcript of Karla Homolka's interview

Canadian Press

MONTREAL — The following is a CBC translation of an interview Karla Homolka gave Monday to Radio-Canada reporter Joyce Napier:

So, Karla Homolka and Sylvie Bordelais (Homolka's lawyer) it's been about two hours since you've been out of jail. This is the first phase of this beginning. Ms. Bordelais, why have you chosen to come here?

Bordelais:

Because it was important to sensitize people to the fact that my client has two choices. Either she lives like a trapped animal, and we don't know what could happen, or she takes the time to come here and meet people and give them her point of view and perhaps to explain a little who she is and what she wants to do.

So, we chose this second option and to come to what we consider a serious media outlet and that's why we're here this afternoon, so she can take the time to speak to you and to present herself to the people as well.

We've heard a lot about her from all kinds of people who said they knew her and have all kinds of different reasons to talk about her, whereas now she's here and she can talk for herself and explain what her goals are and what's it's been like for her.

Napier: You told me there are people you want to thank because they helped you.

Bordelais: That's true and my client will tell you more about that, but speaking for me personally, I have received many e-mails, letters and phone calls from people who wanted to offer her a place to live: they've offered apartments, people offered jobs and money to my client and I have not had a chance to thank them personally.

There are people from across Canada and even farther away, and I have to take this opportunity to thank each and every one of them. Because, there have been times when there were just the two of us, before other lawyers became involved, we were alone and often we'd receive a letter or a phone call and people would say, `What you are hearing in the media does not reflect what everyone thinks.'

But I also need to mention that there are people who are ready to open their homes and to offer support to allow for a successful social rehabilitation.

Napier: Karla Homolka, you've been in jail for 12 years for crimes that have received a lot of media attention across the whole country. And with the whole media frenzy that has occurred over the last few days, what was it like to leave jail?

Homolka: I think I don't fully realize that I am out yet. I'm nervous, anxious. It's hard to describe.

Napier: But how did you get out? Was it a car? Did you have to hide? How did you get out? Were you followed? How did it happen?

Homolka: We were hidden. Ms. Bordelais had a plan and we followed it and we were not followed and we came here without any problems.

Napier: And you stayed hidden in the car until you arrived here?

Homolka: Yes, yes.

Napier: Where were you hidden?

Homolka: In the back of, I don't know what you call it, in the back of the car.

Napier: So, you know the media were really waiting for you outside the prison. They were even camped outside the detention centre at Ste-Anne-des-Plaines. Do you understand why people are so interested in you?

Homolka: Yes, and no. Yes, because I've done terrible things, that's for sure. And I am a woman and it's very rare for a woman to do the kinds of things I have done. And no because there are a lot of people who get out of jail every day who have also done terrible things. But I think I understand more than I don't understand.

Napier: It's been 12 years. We heard you under cross-examination, we heard you through affidavits and through the voice of your lawyers, but never from you directly. How come you decided today, two hours after being freed, to finally speak to us in the media and through us, to the public?

Homolka: It was a very difficult decision to take because I am a very private person and I don't like to talk about my feelings. I want to keep things to myself but it is not possible. So I decided, with my lawyer, that this was the best thing to do because I don't want to be hounded and I don't want people to think that I am a dangerous person who's going to do something to their children. I think it's time I talk.

Napier: When you decided to speak, you chose to speak in French. Why in French?

Homolka: Usually I don't watch the news or read the newspapers, but each time I watched the news in French and especially Radio-Canada they were not as sensational. They don't shout, it's serious and I want to re-start my life in French.

Napier: You've chosen Quebec because you think we judge you with more clemency here?

Homolka: It's certain that the mood in Quebec is not like the mood in Ontario. But I have a support network here that is very important.

Napier: Is it also because in English Canada, the Karla Homolka-Paul Bernardo affair was covered on a daily basis and all of the details were made public? It was very spectacular at the time, especially in the English media. In Quebec we were not as familiar with the details, horrible details, of your case before the courts. Isn't that partly why you chose to live here in Quebec where you are not as well known as you are in Ontario?

Homolka: Not really because everybody is starting to talk about the details. And if anyone wants to know the details, it's very easy to find them out. Yes, it's true that I am less well known here and that is an advantage for me. I think I can re-make my life.

Napier: It's easier to live here. Do you think it's possible for Karla Homolka to re-make her life even in Quebec, to start over or continue a life anonymously, peacefully, quietly after all this media coverage and what you've done?

Homolka: I hope.

Napier: You think it is still possible?

Homolka: Well, everything is possible in life.

Napier: And that is what you are wishing for?

Homolka: Yes, yes.

Napier: And you honestly believe that starting, maybe not tomorrow, but after a certain amount of time, that things will calm down? And that other events will take over and people will forget you? In your head, is that the ideal scenario?

Homolka: Yes, for sure that's the ideal scenario but I don't think everybody will forget me. I can hope.

Napier: And now you're out. It's been a few hours. Karla Homolka is free now. Do you think you've paid your debt to society?

Homolka: That's a difficult question. Legally yes. Emotionally and socially no. No.

Napier: What do you have to do to pay your debt emotionally and socially towards a society that is still obviously judging you?

Homolka: I think socially I have to do as much as possible to help people. But emotionally I am constantly living with what I have done and that will never end.

Napier: When you say helping people, how would you hope to help people?

Homolka: I don't know for sure, but I know that in jail I did things. I was a member of a team of peer counsellors. It was a group of women who are trained to help other inmates. I did many things like that in jail and I want to continue outside. I can't do the same things and I don't know exactly how I am going to do it.

Napier: If you're coming to see us today, it's because you want to tell people that you are no longer a threat to society and that is one of the things people are afraid about and you know it. So, the question is, who are you? If you are not the person you were, are you that person, an exemplary inmate or a criminal?

Homolka: I was an exemplary detainee. There is no doubt about that. I did all my programs. I even did those that weren't part of my rehabilitation program. I did volunteer work. I went to school. I helped other women. I never received an internal report. I did all kinds of things. I went to school. I got my BA. I improved my French.

Napier: You said a few minutes ago that you will always have to live with what you did. Do you feel any remorse?

Homolka: Yes.

Napier: How does it manifest itself, that remorse?

Homolka: I cry often. I can't forgive myself. I think about what I did and often I think I don't deserve to be happy because of what I did.

Napier: How do you judge now what you did? When you think about it, how do you judge yourself?

Homolka: What I did was terrible and I was in a situation where I was unable to see clearly, where I was unable to ask for help. Where I was completely overwhelmed in my life and I regret it enormously because now I know I had the power to stop all of that. But when I was living through it, I thought I had no power.

Napier: To stop even what you did? You didn't have the power to stop yourself?

Homolka: Well I didn't initiate the crimes. I followed. Yes, I did what I did but ....

Napier: You figure you're not a danger today?

Homolka: Not at all. Not at all.

Napier: You're not likely to "follow'' again, as you say?

Homolka: No.

Napier: And what makes you say that today you would not follow, like you did in the past?

Homolka: Well, first of all I am an adult. Back then I was 17 years old. I didn't know much. I was afraid of being abandoned. I absolutely wanted to have a relationship. I did not have self-confidence. There are a lot of things about myself that I didn't know then that I know now.

Napier: You had a relationship in prison with someone who killed his wife. Have you continued this relationship with Jean-Paul Gerbet?

Homolka: I am not prepared to talk about people I knew in prison.

Napier: Why? Is there a particular reason you don't want to talk about it?

Homolka: Yes, because I have lived through the whole media circus and I don't want the friends I had in jail to be subjected to that. I am not here to talk, but ...

Napier: Are you still communicating with him in any way?

Homolka: I have already answered that question.

Napier: Do you consider that today you are rehabilitated?

Homolka: Yes.

Napier: Today, you are coming out of prison, you say you don't read the newspapers. But in the newspapers, there is this analysis of the agreement you had with the Crown. I'm sure that even if you haven't read newspapers you've heard of this, about this agreement with the Crown that your ex-husband's lawyer has called the "Deal with the Devil'' that was even the title of a book that was written afterwards.

You had reduced charges in the murders of Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy. Twelve years reduced sentence. And finally your role was as big as Paul Bernardo's. We talked about you as the woman who had the battered wife syndrome, and that you were under his influence. When you think about it today, do you still see yourself as having been a victim back then?

Homolka: First of all, everybody who says I had a role equal to him do not know the case. That's the first thing. And secondly, yes, I was under his influence.

Napier: Before moving onto your new life, because there is a future, you received threats Do I understand correctly that you've received death threats? What kind of death threats, and did you receive them directly, and if so in what way?

Homolka: Well, because I spent the last month and a half by myself in a men's prison, I have not received any threats. My mail was intercepted, read, all that. The threats I received in Joliette were by telephone, and they were directed to the guards because people cannot call us directly in prison. I was told the two people who called said I was going to die. In the past, often the threats I received were from inmates, who told me that they would kill me.

Napier: This was in Joliette?

Homolka: No, it was in Kingston and in Saskatchewan when I was there. I spent four years in Kingston in isolation because of the threats. Also, when I was transferred to Saskatchewan, I was in isolation for the same reasons. My parents also received death threats about me.

Napier: Your parents have moved, they still live in same place?

Homolka: No, they haven't moved.

Napier: Do you have a relationship with your family?

Homolka: Yes.

Napier: Good relationships?

Homolka: Yes.

Napier: With your father, your mother, and you have one sister?

Homolka: Yes.

Napier: Will you see them soon? They are here, your family is here?

Homolka: Yes. My mother is here.

Napier: Have you maintained a good relationship with your mother in these 12 years? Your mother came to visit you?

Homolka: My whole family has visited me.

Napier: Your relationships with family are difficult?

Homolka: In what way?

Napier: In the sense of what happened with your sister. You had a little sister.

Homolka: Yes.

Napier: You took part with Paul Bernardo in the death of your little sister and in the rape of your little sister. Hence my question as to whether your relationship with your family is difficult.

Homolka: No, my family loves me, and my family has also lived with my ex-husband and my mother had no idea what happened in my relationship with him. My parents' friends had no idea. Everybody thought he was No. 1. My family has never rejected me for what I did. My mother only said that she hates what I did, but she loves me and we have a very beautiful relationship. I am very lucky.

Napier: And with your father too?

Homolka: Yes, the same thing.

Napier: Well, where will you settle down?

Homolka: I'm not answering this question.

Napier: Is it in Quebec?

Homolka: It's in the province of Quebec.

Napier: And why don't you want to answer this question? Are you afraid?

Homolka: Would you give your address on television?

Napier: I'm not asking you for your address. I'm asking you where you're going to settle down.

Homolka: No, no, I don't want to.

Napier: Are you going to work?

Homolka: Yes, I'd like to.

Napier: What kind of work would you like to do?

Homolka: I'm ready to do anything, except the only things important to me are first, that it be legal. Second, that it is moral. And third, that it doesn't go against my conditions.

Napier: And what kind of support or help are you going to have? Because it's been 12 years that you've been inside prison. Are you going to need help or support? And if so, where will you find it?

Homolka: I already have people in my life who are giving me all kinds of help. I also see a psychologist.

Napier: Are you afraid of this new life that awaits you?

Homolka: Yes, yes.

Napier: And what will be the first thing that you'd like to do?

Homolka: This is stupid. I'd like to have an iced cappuccino. An iced cappuccino from Tim Hortons, that's what I'd like to do.

Napier: So, you are today, Karla Homolka, a free woman, a truly free woman?

Homolka: No, no. I think I will never be truly free. Because there are different kinds of prisons. There are concrete prisons, and there are internal prisons. And I think I will always be in an internal prison.

Napier: Why?

Homolka: Because of what I did. I would like to go back in time and re-do things, but I can't.

Napier: So it's something you'll never forget?

Homolka: Never, never. I think about it all the time. At every anniversary, every Christmas, all the time.

Napier: And with the years it hasn't faded?

Homolka: I thought that it would happen, but I realize that it's not true. It just gets harder.

Napier: Thank you.

Homolka: You're welcome.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1120564138762_3

[StoneMtn]

Homolka decision faces appeal

[color:gray]Quebec will move to have restrictions on released killer put back in place

By PETER RAKOBOWCHUK

Saturday, December 3, 2005 Page A15

Canadian Press

MONTREAL -- The families of Karla Homolka's victims are expressing renewed hope now that the Quebec government announced it will appeal the court ruling that lifted all the restrictions on her freedom.

The father of Kristen French was delighted with Quebec's decision.

"You wanna believe it, you wanna believe it," Doug French said yesterday from his home in St. Catharines, Ont. "Let's hope they work this time," he said of the restrictions.

Quebec Justice Minister Yvon Marcoux's decision to seek leave to appeal the ruling comes just two days after a judge decided that Ms. Homolka can go where she wants and meet anyone she pleases.

"After having analyzed the judgment, the decision has been taken to appeal the judgment of Mr. Justice James Brunton in the case of Karla Teale Homolka," Mr. Marcoux said in Quebec City.

He will also ask the Quebec Court of Appeal to move quickly to put the court-imposed restrictions on Ms. Homolka back in place in the meantime and speed up the appeal process. Those requests will be heard on Tuesday in Montreal.

The provincial Justice Department also maintains that the Quebec Superior Court judge erred in his ruling when he quashed the restrictions on Ms. Homolka's movements.

Justice Department lawyer Joanne Marceau said the judge "misinterpreted the criteria used to determine if Homolka presented an imminent and serious danger."

Judge Brunton's decision is still in effect pending the appeal, meaning Ms. Homolka, who is believed to be living in the Montreal area, has no restrictions on her freedom. She was released from prison in July, after serving her entire 12-year sentence in the manslaughter deaths of Ontario teens Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy in the 1990s.

Tim Danson, the lawyer for the victims' families, called on the Quebec government to support their bid for intervenor status in the appeal. The families were "outraged and incensed" that they weren't allowed to argue the merits of the case during the hearing that led to Ms. Homolka's release restrictions being overturned.

The restrictions under Criminal Code provisions were handed down in June after another judge ruled Ms. Homolka still posed a risk to the community.

They included having to report her whereabouts and travel plans to police on a regular basis and not having any contact with violent criminals. She was also to provide a DNA sample when she left prison, but it was not clear if that was done.

But Ms. Homolka can now contact her ex-husband, Paul Bernardo, who is serving a life sentence in prison for his role in the slayings, and Jean-Paul Gerbet, who is serving time for having killed his former girlfriend. She began a jailhouse relationship with Mr. Gerbet in January, 2002.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20051203/HOMOLKA03/TPNational/Canada