timouse Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 i got this from a listserv i'm on. Michael Pollan has written a number of books on agriculture and the food industry, and is a professor of journalism at UC Berkeley.Michael PollanNew York Times http://pollan.blogs.nytimes.com/May 24, 2006The Great Yellow HopeI've been traveling in the American Corn Belt this past week, andwherever I go, people are talking about the promise of ethanol. Corn-distillation plants are popping up across the country likedandelions,and local ethanol boosters in Minnesota, Illinois, Iowa and evenWashington State (where Bill Gates is jumping into the business) aregiddy at the prospect of supplanting OPEC with a homegrown,America-first corn cartel. But as much as I'd like to have a greenerfuel to power my car, I'm afraid corn-based ethanol is not that fuel.In principle, making fuel from plants makes good sense. Instead ofspewing fossilized carbon into the atmosphere, you're burning thesamecarbon that a plant removed from the air only a few months earlier -so, theoretically, you've added no additional carbon. Sounds prettygreen - and would be, if the plant you proposed to make the ethanolfrom were grown in a green way. But corn is not.The way we grow corn in this country consumes tremendous quantitiesoffossil fuel. Corn receives more synthetic fertilizer than any othercrop, and that fertilizer is made from fossil fuels - mostly naturalgas. Corn also receives more pesticide than any other crop, and mostof that pesticide is made from petroleum. To plow or disc thecornfields, plant the seed, spray the corn and harvest it takes largeamounts of diesel fuel, and to dry the corn after harvest requiresnatural gas. So by the time your "green" raw material arrives at theethanol plant, it is already drenched in fossil fuel. Every bushel ofcorn grown in America has consumed the equivalent of between a thirdand a half gallon of gasoline.And that's before you distill the corn into ethanol, an energy-intensive process that requires still more fossil fuel. Estimatesvary, but they range from two-thirds to nine-tenths of a gallon ofoilto produce a single gallon of ethanol. (The more generous number doesnot count all the energy costs of growing the corn.) Some estimatesare still more dismal, suggesting it may actually take more than agallon of fossil fuel to produce a gallon of our putative alternativeto fossil fuel.Making ethanol from corn makes no more sense from an economic pointofview. The federal government offers a tax break of 54 cents for everygallon of ethanol produced, and this incentive is what has generatedthe enthusiasm for ethanol refining: the spigot of public money isopen and the pigs are rushing to the trough. (At the same time, thegovernment protects domestic ethanol producers by imposing a tariffof54 cents a gallon on imported ethanol.) According to the Wall StreetJournal, it will cost U.S. taxpayers $120 for every barrel of oilsaved by making ethanol. Some "savings." This is very good newsindeedfor Archer Daniels Midland, the agricultural processing company thatcontrols about 30 percent of the ethanol market. (And, it would seem,a comparable percentage of the U.S. Congress, which has beenshoweringthe company with ethanol subsidies since the days when Bob Dole ofKansas was known as the senatorfrom A.D.M.)Absurd as it is, the rush to turn our corn surplus into ethanolappears unstoppable, and the corn belt, laboring under the weight offalling corn prices for the past several years, is celebrating thegreat good fortune of $3-a-gallon gas prices. We're desperate foralternatives, and all that corn is waiting to be distilled. As cornprices rise (and the giddiness has already given them a bump),farmerswill be tempted to produce yet more corn, which is not good news forthe environment this whole deal is supposed to help. Why not? Becausefarmers will apply more nitrogen to boost yields (leading to morenitrogen pollution) and, since soy bean prices are down, they will betempted to return to a "corn-on-corn" rotation. That is, rather thanrotate their corn crops with soy beans (a legume that builds nitrogenin he soil), farmers will plant corn year after year, requiring stillmore synthetic nitrogen and doing long-term damage to the land.It's not easy being green.But just because making ethanol from corn is an environmentally andeconomically absurd proposition doesn't mean ethanol made from otherplants is a bad idea. If you can make ethanol from a plant thatdoesn't take so much energy to grow in the first place, the economicsand energetics begin look a lot better. The Brazilians make ethanolfrom sugar cane, a perennial crop that doesn't require nearly as muchfossil fuel to grow. Switch grass, too, is a perennial crop thatgrowsjust about anywhere, requires little or no fertilizer and needs noplowing or annual replanting. And although the technology for makingethanol from grasses (cellulosic ethanol - distilled from plantcellulose rather than starch) is not quite there yet, it holds realpotential. So why the stampede to make ethanol from corn? Because wehave so much of it, and such a powerful lobby promoting itsconsumption. Ethanol is just the latest chapter in a long, sorryhistory of clever and profitable schemes to dispose of surplus corn:there was corn liquor in the 19th century; feedlot meat starting inthe 1950's and, since 1980, high fructose corn syrup. We grow morethan 10 billion bushels of corn a year in this country, far more thanwe can possibly eat - though God knows we're doing our best, bingeingon corn-based fast food and high fructose corn syrup till we're fatand diabetic. We probably can't eat much more of the stuff withoutexploding, so the corn lobby is targeting the next unsuspecting beastthat might help chomp through the surplus: your car.Michael Pollan is the author, most recently, of "The Omnivore'sDilemma: A Natural history of Four Meals," which was published inApril. His previous books include: "Second Nature," "A Place of MyOwn" and "The Botany of Desire," a New York Times bestseller. Acontributing writer for The New York Times Magazine, Mr. Pollan istheKnight Professor of Journalism at the University of California,Berkeley. Many of his food articles can be found atmichaelpollan.com. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothedShredder Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 I like the looks of that water engine...Until then, there should be a tax on anyone who drives into a city daily to get to work... to drive home the point that a daily communte can take more out of the world than one can possibly put back into it with their 'bueruacratic' or 'sales' job.As far as oil, isn't it made from "million year old corn/forrest/animals" all decomposed... TO THE EXTREME? Ethonol per se, wouldn't exactly remove air borne emissions, rather it would only remove the dependance on foreign sources. The gains are political and economical, but not neccesarily environmental.Try to live near where you work if you're in a city people! And if that's challenging, get yourself living on or near a high flow trasit system! Cars + Cities = Poison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexis Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 nice article, thanks for posting it. it's definitely got some interesting full circle points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisley Posted May 28, 2006 Report Share Posted May 28, 2006 (edited) enjoyed the one episode of the CoolFuel RoadTrip I caught... they brought up that ethanol isn't a totally practical fuel yet but also said that there are high hopes for improved refinement technologies(you can download pdf alternative fuel lessons off that site too)about the best vehicle they showed on the episode I saw was a car that used ethanol biodiesel when necessary but mostly ran off of fuel cells powered by the waterfall in the owner's backyard (it also supplied all the power for his house and generated income for him when he sold his surplus power back to "the grid")waterfall "micro hydro" power makes me smile :cool: Edited May 28, 2006 by Guest Micro Hydro Power! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisley Posted May 28, 2006 Report Share Posted May 28, 2006 those pdf lessons mentioned above are really for kids (or big kids, if you feel so inclined) but if you're interested in alt fuel topics the "CoolFuel Allied Organizations Links" section is a pretty good starting point couple of clicks brought me to Willie Nelson's Farm Fresh Biodiesel page currently enjoying reading a "Layman's guide on how to develop a small hydro site" downloaded from the "Books" section of micro hydro power.net waterfall power here I come! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now