Jump to content
Jambands.ca

Go Sens Go - Fan Forum 08/09


badams

Recommended Posts

I think the point Booche is trying to drive mercilessly home is that the Sens deficiencies on defense are resulting in piss poor offensive play whether it be outlet passing, cycling, or just keeping the damn puck in the zone thus resulting in a lower GPG.

Even I knew that, and I am hardly a "master debater".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah, I understand that but that's not the only point I'm trying to make.

I don't think Priessing/Corvo/Meszaros would be making any sort of difference if they were still in Ottawa. Corvo is playing the best out of those 3 this year, but still has fewer points than Kuba.

Carolina's top 3 scorers...

Whitney 40 points

Staal 36 points

Brind'Amour 29 points

Corvo has 14 assists.

Tampa

St. Louis 48 points

Vinny 46 points

Recchi 33 points

Mezzy 14 assists

LA

Brown 38 points

Kopitar 38 points

Frolov 34 points

Preissing 4 assists in 22 games

Ottawa

Heatley 45 points

Alfie 44 points

Spezza 39 points

Kuba 24 assists....

Who's got the best puck moving d-man out of those 4 guys.

That's all I'm trying to say...not saying that the d isn't the problem, but still having any of those 3 still would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that buuuuuuuuuut Filip isn't playing 60 minutes of hockey.

It's moot whether or not Kuba is superior to Preissing, Meszaros or Corvo (he probably is). But he's not better than all three of those guys taking ice time on various shifts.

The Sens are lacking the depth on D to have someone on the ice consistently enabling production across all of the lines. Look at the other lines point totals.

2006-2007 Sens - Phillips, Redden, Corvo, Meszaros, Volchenkov, Preissing

2008-2009 Sens - Phillips, Picard, Kuba, Lee, Smith, Bell

There just isn't enough to go around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well seeing as they couldn't win the cup with the 2006-2007 roster I doubt it but it might have them in playoff contention.

I think having any 2 of those 3 and not skating Bell and Lee would make a difference.

Have you seen Bell try to set up behind net and get things going....it's terrifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the past is the past....

All those players are gone, and Murray wasn't able to shore up a D that we should have. Hence why he should have been fired.

The short story here is that the entire team is to blame, not just the defence. There are alot of other players not performing, Fisher, Kelly, Vermette, just to name a few.

Anyhoo, just another day in the argument department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are alot of other players not performing, Fisher, Kelly, Vermette, just to name a few.

Add Heater, Spazza and Alfie.

Hmmmmmm. I wonder why that is?

To fix something you have to start somewhere and its pretty obvious where Murray has instilled his core, so...........

According to Booche;

Preissing or Corvo or Mezsaros or Redden-Picard

Kuba-Lee

Phillips-A-Train

would somehow win the Stanley Cup...

Dont make shit up. This debate may save someone's life man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are alot of other players not performing' date=' Fisher, Kelly, Vermette, just to name a few.[/quote']

Add Heater, Spazza and Alfie.

Hmmmmmm. I wonder why that is?

To fix something you have to start somewhere and its pretty obvious where Murray has instilled his core, so...........

According to Booche;

Preissing or Corvo or Mezsaros or Redden-Picard

Kuba-Lee

Phillips-A-Train

would somehow win the Stanley Cup...

Dont make shit up. This debate may save someone's life man!

I thought that's what we were arguing about via email?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that's what we were arguing about via email?

I never suggested the Sens would make the playoffs let alone win the Stanley Cup.

I think your post should have been more inclusive so I can continue fuÇking the dog. Can we argue about that?

I thought we just did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never expect NHL players to tell you how they really feel about an ex-coach with a dozen microphones stuck in their chin. Sometimes, they’ll put on their sad face and feign shame for the cameras, then hoot and high-five in the back room later, thrilled to see the jerk gone.

Let’s be clear, the Ottawa Senators did not do that Monday when they learned Craig Hartsburg had been fired. They do feel shame. They know Hartsburg is a good man. They know they are now on their fourth coach in less than one season, and are embarrassed at the notion that they have become “uncoachableâ€.

The Senator players I spoke to Monday took collective responsibility for getting Hartsburg fired. And every one of them called him a “good hockey coach†who they have respect for. They wanted to win for him. They weren’t chest-bumping as he walked out the door.

But they weren’t exactly crying in their Gatorade either. They was a divide between coach and players. When you sit 27th in the standings, there is always a divide.

The problem many Senators had with Hartsburg was his stubbornness. He implemented a system in training camp, and refused to budge from it. Nary a tweak. The players say when things went bad, Hartsburg always believed it was because of “a lack of effortâ€. There was never any other explanation.

Specifically, the one-man forecheck drove many players nuts. They believe they are at their best as an aggressive team, with 2 men always going hard into the opposition’s end, the way they did during the Cup run two springs ago. Having that second man hang back left them “standing around an awful lot.†Yet they never strayed from it.

The other main beef with Hartsburg was his negativity. Oh, he had plenty to be negative about with this team, that’s for sure. But there were moments where the Senators were desperate for positive reinforcement, and never got it.

They point to a stretch before the All-Star break where they went 3-0-1, and showed signs of making a run. Yet several players say even after the wins, Hartsburg would come into the room and pick out only the mistakes, further eroding their already shaky confidence.

Make no mistake. No one in that room is putting the blame on Craig Hartsburg for the team’s predicament. They are smarter than that. They realize their “coach's fault†excuse ran out about two coaches ago.

Just like you, the Senators don’t have an answer to their woes. But most are certain of at least one thing: this time the coach won’t be the only change. This time, some of them will be following Craig Hartsburg out the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In response to AD's post, I had no idea so many Terrell Owens played hockey. What a bunch of coach-killing-coddledcunts!

Positive reinforcement? Please. A coach is supposed to point out mistakes no matter if you lose 7 - nothing or win by the same amount. That's how you learn. I fuckingwell hope Hartsburgh hangs some of these selfish pricks out for the rest of the league to see. Maybe a GM will think twice about grabbing one of them.

He probably wont if he wants another crack in the NHL but I sure hope he knocks on that door a little bit. They had a problem with his stubborness? I can just imagine what he went through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aw booche you're so emotional when you talk of your beloved sens.

i thought this paragraph was interesting:

"Specifically, the one-man forecheck drove many players nuts. They believe they are at their best as an aggressive team, with 2 men always going hard into the opposition’s end, the way they did during the Cup run two springs ago. Having that second man hang back left them “standing around an awful lot.†Yet they never strayed from it."

Seems to me Alfie or Phillips or someone should have said something. And if they did, Hartsburg should have listened. Or at least watched some tape of the Cup-run-year and see what was different. Seems to me that a hard forecheck is something that even a novice tape-watcher could pick out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that a hard forecheck is something that even a novice tape-watcher could pick out.

You need to have the right personel to play that style, specifically a solid D for the inevitable counter-attack when the forecheck fails not to mention the right forwards who can skate as well as willing to give/take a hit, and I would bet Hartsburgh knew he didnt have it. Much more than you or I and the rest of the flubbers on the Sens squad anyways.

If I am Bryan Murray, those whiney sonsofbitches who called out their former coach would be the first to go.

oh, and Preissing was a scratch

A scratch for the Kings doesnt mean a scratch for the Sens, not by a long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...