Who would choose the 3rd party? (And aren't most environmental impact studies done by 3rd parties [e.g., consulting firms hired by government] now?) How do you measure what the level of public outcry is? (And who would define what that "certain level" of outcry would be?) What would happen if there was the required level of publc outcry about a decision (that was based on a 3rd party's investigation), resulting in a 4th party's investigation, that reached exactly the same conclusion as the 3rd party? Could there be another chance for "public outcry" demanding (and getting) a 5th party doing an investigation? I apologize. I should have phrased that as, "If city council says, in effect, 'Yes, we did a study, here are the results, we think it's OK, the decision stands', would that (along with the presentation of results of the study) meet the 'accountability' demand?" Would it? In other words, how would a demand for accountability (in all policy decisions) limit the authority of, say, a city council to do its job? (And note that I'm not saying a demand of accountability would be a bad thing, it's more that I don't quite understand what it would do that existing laws, especially those that require environmental studies, don't do.) Aloha, Brad