Hux Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 This is a good article for those buying the overly simplistic "all Liberals are corrupt" stuff.It's my hope that people are equally weary in believing what ALL parties are telling them, and the media. All the parties are equally lusting for power, and I sense that there is sometimes some naivite (sp?) among some who think that certain parties, say the NDP or CPC - are somehow acting on some higher purity of motivation, don't buy it. Get the facts and don't forget to vote!"Let's not overuse the term 'corrupt'"Globe and MailJanuary 3, 2006 Page: A13By: Anthony WestellThe issue trumping all others in this election is the charge that the Liberalgovernment and the Liberal Party are corrupt. Conservative Leader Stephen Harperrepeats this as if it were a fact beyond dispute, and the media do not challengehim. The charge is one of those untruths that, when repeated often enough,become "true."Even to suggest that it is untrue, as I just have, will shock many people. Solet us examine the evidence. Mr. Harper bases his charge on the report by Mr.Justice John Gomery on what has become known as the Adscam scandal. The judgeuncovered a sordid scheme that took place a decade ago when Jean Chrétien wasprime minister in which a few politicians and civil servants in Ottawa grosslyoverpaid advertising agencies in Montreal that then pocketed part of the cashand kicked back some to organizers for the Quebec Liberal Party.Having established the facts to his own satisfaction, Judge Gomery asked: "Whois responsible?" Answering the question, he specifically cleared Paul Martin andall the members of his cabinet: "On the evidence there is no basis forattributing blame or responsibility to any other minister of the Chrétiencabinet, since they, like all members of Parliament, were not informed of theinitiatives being authorized by Mr. [Jean] Pelletier [Mr. Chrétien's chief ofstaff] and their funding from the unity reserve. Mr. Martin, whose role asfinance minister did not involve him in the supervision of spending by the PMO[Prime Minister's Office] or PWGSC [Public Works and Government ServicesCanada], is entitled, like other ministers in the Quebec caucus, to beexonerated from any blame for carelessness or misconduct."Mark that phrase, "entitled . . . to be exonerated": It's as if Mr. Harper andothers throwing around charges of corruption in this government were ready tobelieve everything in the Gomery report except that Mr. Martin and his cabinetare not corrupt, or guilty of overlooking corruption.Yes, there are accusations against members of the previous government, but theyare not as serious, in the sense of being widespread, as we are led to believe.Mr. Chrétien cannot escape responsibility, says the report -- but responsibilityfor lax administration, not corruption. "The absence of any evidence of directinvolvement [in the kickback scheme] entitles both Mr. Pelletier and Mr.Chrétien to be exonerated from blame . . ." Mr. Chrétien is challenging in courteven the finding of bad management.The only other minister held responsible for anything is Alfonso Gagliano. JudgeGomery found that, despite his denials, the former public works minister wasclosely involved in the direction of the program intended to raise the federalprofile in Quebec -- "Mr. Gagliano became directly involved in decisions toprovide funding to events and projects for partisan purposes, having little todo with considerations of national unity" -- and was responsible for theactivities of his political staff, who were even more involved. Mr. Gaglianoleft politics in 2002.So is the Liberal Party of Canada corrupt? Judge Gomery referred only to the"Liberal Party of Canada (Quebec)," which, he said, could not escaperesponsibility for the conduct of its officers, and he named four persons. It isabsurd to extrapolate from that that the entire Liberal Party is corrupt.Ironically, the minister credited with cleaning up the mess when he took overfrom Mr. Gagliano is Finance Minister Ralph Goodale, who is now on the politicalhook after the RCMP launched a criminal investigation into whether the federalgovernment's plans for income trusts were leaked. According to Judge Gomery,normal procedures had not been followed in the administration of the sponsorshipprogram, leaving it open to error, abuse and careless administration: "Mr.Goodale saw these flaws immediately and froze the program" until controls couldbe put in place.Does any of this sound like the systemic corruption that is supposed to riddlethe Martin government? Of course not. There are plenty of reasons one might wishto toss the Liberals out of office, but corruption is not one of them. To keepmaking a baseless charge demeans the country in foreign eyes and encourages thecynicism too many Canadians already feel about their democracy.Anthony Westell, a former Globe and Mail Ottawa bureau chief, is author ofReinventing Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazlo Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Boo fuckin' hoo and get a real job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bouche Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Hey Huxy, while you're posting, can you explain what the deal is with this Marjijuana policy survey?Press conferenceInvitationNORML Canada launches it’s marijuana policy survey for candidates in the 2006 federal election.Ottawa, Jan 4th 2006, Given the prominence of marijuana prohibition in recent Canadian public discourse, it is truly surprising that the issue has not been raised in the present federal election campaign. Accordingly, NORML Canada has prepared a questionnaire to assess the opinions of candidates on this important debate - to ensure that the demand for legal reform doesn't get swept under the rug once again.To present the questionnaire that has been mailed to every candidate, and explain NORML’s election awareness campaign, a press conference will be held this Thursday Jan 5th at 11am at the parliamentary press gallery in Ottawa, in the centre block on parliament hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollie Posted January 4, 2006 Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 Mark that phrase, "entitled . . . to be exonerated": It's as if Mr. Harper andothers throwing around charges of corruption in this government were ready tobelieve everything in the Gomery report except that Mr. Martin and his cabinetare not corrupt, or guilty of overlooking corruption.Sing it sister!! This is my main point of contention with the Conservative's motion to bring down the government. You either believe it to be a valid document or not. You don't get to pick and choose which conclusions you agree with. To do so is to challenge the legitimacy of the very document you are using to support your agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 i don't think the liberal party of canada is corrupt.. but i do enjoy the constant criticism they've been getting lately. it's kind of refreshing actually.. coming out of a decade of liberal finger pointing, painting the right out to be inhumane, capitalist workhorses or george bush wannabes.. the libs had a hayday with mulroney.. he made it ever so easy. now today though, i'm sure some conservatives somewhere are putting their feet up on their desk over this one and i love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Evil_Mouse Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 If we're not criticising our leaders, then we're chumps.I like the fact that, unlike in the States, nobody seems to have much difficulty taking the mickey out of our leaders at any given opportunity. How often does the US president get heckled in the normal course of things? Jesus, you'd think they missed the old monarchy. My favourite video bit to show to ESL students remains the clip from This Hour Has 22 Minutes of Rick Mercer out at the Burger King with Jean Cretien. Pure gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 i've never seen that particular rick mercer clip but i used to love him back in my university days... the exposes on american knowledge of their friendly northerly neighbour were my favourite.. seal hunting in saskatchewan.. i used to laugh myself into tears over that stuff. i think that guy does wonders in aiding our struggle for a national identity, even if that national identity is only a collective anti-american sentiment. i'll take it. it sure beats those ridiculous gov't created tv commercials.. the one reminiscing louis riel is somewhat dramatic. the noose? i think i gasped when i first saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggrtrhhrtgg Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 I have a question: what is the value of having a "national identity"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 honestly.. i have no idea. never had one. i don't even know what a national identity is!i would suppose it would be a warm and fuzzy feeling of some sort... the kind you get when you hear the national anthem being played after team canada just kicked team america's ass at hockey.. but it would be shared by all.the value of which i have no idea.. perhaps in times of war, if we had a government who went to war, we could feel oh so patriotic and slap a yellow ribbon sticker on the bumpers of our cars and become the people that so many of us canadians despise.. the type that can rattle off battle statistics and name every monument and its significance in this great land. the type that no matter what the outcome, we always won. the value of it being the credibility given to our government.. the justification of an action. legitimacy, if you will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggrtrhhrtgg Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 I still get teary eyed when Canada wins at hockey,--that is called "national pride" which really doesn't have much to do with "national identity". Maybe, just maybe, this country is very progressive, and maybe just maybe the fact that we don't really have a distinct national identity is a possible stepping stone to creating universal unity and acceptance. Which makes me very proud to be Canadian and which is another major reason why I will vote Liberal. There is nothing "progressive" about conservatism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 I still get teary eyed when Canada wins at hockey, me too.. i become super anxious.. biting my nails.. on the edge of the couch.. can't watch situations. --that is called "national pride" which really doesn't have much to do with "national identity". i beg to differ.. i think the formation of a national identity requires the sharing of these types of moments. the kind of moments that can be talked about collectively and that we all can 'identify' with. olympic hockey is a REALLY bad example but one of the closest i've got. Maybe, just maybe, this country is very progressive, and maybe just maybe the fact that we don't really have a distinct national identity is a possible stepping stone to creating universal unity and acceptance. i agree. Canada is an amazingly beautiful country and is home to some amazingly beautiful people. our problems on a global scale are miniscule and on the national scale aren't even big enough to turn a government. but i still find something in me that is longing for a greater connection of sorts. universal unity and acceptance is great, but it doesn't give me the sense of belonging i long for. Which makes me very proud to be Canadian and which is another major reason why I will vote Liberal. There is nothing "progressive" about conservatism. to each their own. i'm ready for change. stir the pot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggrtrhhrtgg Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) "universal unity and acceptance is great, but it doesn't give me the sense of belonging i long for." What about just being happy with being a member of the human race? (think outside the box--aka border) The only change we are going to see is a minority to a majority!!! Edited January 5, 2006 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 What about just being happy with being a member of the human race? yah.. there's that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schwa. Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 The Liberal Party must be corrupt, T.V. doesn't lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timouse Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 The Liberal Party must be corrupt, T.V. doesn't lie. and i read it on the internet too. they must be crooks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcO Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 I don't believe there is a single party that could be elected and not suffer some credibility and corruption issues, especially over successive re-elections. It's a sad part of human nature but it is not exclusive to any particular party.So, no the Liberal Party is not in and of itself corrupt, that's silly. But certainly some Liberals have the capacity for corruption, as has been displayed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Boy 2.0 Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 and the "culture of entitlement" is another concept which seeped into our consciousness and is doing the Libs no good at allSo Hux, what's the plan to halt the Tories' momentum? Crunch time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcO Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 and the "culture of entitlement" is another concept which seeped into our consciousness and is doing the Libs no good at allyou can thank Bob Weir for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Boy 2.0 Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schwa. Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 is that pic from Hookahville? looks familiar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Boy 2.0 Posted January 5, 2006 Report Share Posted January 5, 2006 here's the caption:bob weir rat dog muss durch den schlammGoogle translation:bob weir advice dog must by the mudmakes sense to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now