MarcO Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 I'm looking for some light Summer reading (heh heh) and was wondering if anyone can recommend a good book on this subject. It's one that I have never been able to wrap my head totally around because it is hard to find anything that is just the cold, hard facts, without the rhetoric.I'd like to educate myself a little on this subject a bit more. I'm not clueless about it but I can't speak of it with any authority.Please let me clear: I want to start by reading as impartial an account of this dilemma as I can find.thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afro poppa Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Its gonna be tough finding something completely impartial, especially while its still going on. Maybe 100 years from now (if its over by then, I wouldn't bet on it) there will impartial history books on it but I think as is the case with most recent history, everyone has an opinion on it. I would say stay up to date with the news and read a variety of different (albiet probably biased) sources and then make an opinion based on other people's opinions...or is that precisely what you don't want to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcO Posted June 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 oh no, I can do that, and try to.I'm going camping for several days soon and wanted to bring something new to read with me. Seemed like a good opportunity to investigate this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradm Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 While it's definitely biased, The Case For Israel by Alan Dershowitz might be a good read.Aloha,Brad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booche Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Please let me clear: I want to start by reading as impartial an account of this dilemma as I can find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Evil_Mouse Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 I tend to enjoy anything by Edward Said on this, in large measure because he tends to view all sides in the conflict with a cynical eye. While it's a bit dated, Geoffrey Wheatcroft's The Controversy of Zion (Addison Wesley, 1996) makes for a good historical overview. And while it involves much broader discussions than just I/P, Karen Armstrong's The Battle for God (Ballantine 2001) puts it in good context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 (edited) MarcO i went through the exact same want of learning about a year or so ago.. and if you want my advice, i'd start with books that don't necessarily tackle the issues between israelis and palestians, but rather with books that tackle the history of each group of people on an individual level.. getting a solid understanding of who a group of people are first, makes more sense to me than trying to grasp why groups of people fail in relations with other groups of people. if i was a hammerite, i'd hit up the MAC library and talk to a librarian. Edited June 28, 2006 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afro poppa Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Birdy's got the right idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Evil_Mouse Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 getting a solid understanding of who a group of people are firstYes, absolutely, with the caveat that the "a" is plural - there are always divisions within every group from the very beginning, and these divisions affect the way things subsequently play out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamH Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 "israelites and palestians"Desmond Dekker (RIP) is the only one who can call them israelites. You mean IsraelisInterestingly some of my hardcore relatives like to call Palestinians "arabs" which I think is derogatory but can't prove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdy Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 (edited) sorry. :blush: yet in my defence, after a brief google search, the entire world wide web uses the term. like, literally. most online dictionaries too. Edited June 28, 2006 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Evil_Mouse Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Interestingly some of my hardcore relatives like to call Palestinians "arabs" which I think is derogatory but can't prove.This is always imprecise; you could say that the Arab population is spread out through the Middle East across the Maghreb to Morocco and on up into Spain, etc. Is it based on language? I always found that angle funny; given that Arabic is a semitic language, calling any Arab anti-Semitic is always silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Wooly Mammoth Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 I thought that One Palestine Complete by Tom Segev was a good book. It covers the time period when Palestine was under British Occupation, 1918-1947 IIRC. i.e. the end of WWI until the establishment of the State of Israel. Segev is a writer for Haaretz, which is a leftish leaning Israeli newspaper. It really gives you a good understanding of how Israel came, what the Palestinians expected, and how this conflict got initiated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcO Posted June 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 any thoughts on Thomas Friedman's "From Beirut to Jerusalem"?It was recommended to me elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groove Fetish Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 this guys work is top notch as maybe as light as this topic can be and still not avoiding the heavy aspects. Joe Sacco- Who Wrote Palestine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoolshed Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 My bottom line: F@ck Tibet...Free Palestine.It is beyond my understanding why the world hasn't done something about this yet. 75% unemployment, up to 20 hours a day curfew (so how could anyone work anyways), no infrastructure left, and 1 in four palestinian kids are physically afflicted in their upbringing due to starvation. Not to mention constantly assaulted by missile attacks and threatened by a biased nation that has nuclear weapons, against world policy.I'm not saying it's one sided, because Israel has to maintain a heavy presence because they're surrounded by 7 aggressive nations.Other important reading is the connection between USA and Israel, and why the USA continuouly vetos UN motions involved with funding or probing palestinian deaths.Unfortunately, being someone who hates all religions equally, I'll never understand what gives the western nations (england included) the right to assign a huge chunk of land (thereby transplanting others) to a group based upon a religious fable believed by a small minority of the world (being the bible people- mainly the christians and the jews).Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenenbaum Posted June 28, 2006 Report Share Posted June 28, 2006 Free TibetFree ChechneyaLong Live JerusalemQuebec Sovereignty Now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcO Posted June 29, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 My bottom line: F@ck Tibet...Free Palestine.It is beyond my understanding why the world hasn't done something about this yet. 75% unemployment, up to 20 hours a day curfew (so how could anyone work anyways), no infrastructure left, and 1 in four palestinian kids are physically afflicted in their upbringing due to starvation. Not to mention constantly assaulted by missile attacks and threatened by a biased nation that has nuclear weapons, against world policy.I'm not saying it's one sided, because Israel has to maintain a heavy presence because they're surrounded by 7 aggressive nations.Other important reading is the connection between USA and Israel, and why the USA continuouly vetos UN motions involved with funding or probing palestinian deaths.Unfortunately, being someone who hates all religions equally, I'll never understand what gives the western nations (england included) the right to assign a huge chunk of land (thereby transplanting others) to a group based upon a religious fable believed by a small minority of the world (being the bible people- mainly the christians and the jews).StephenFair enough my man, but you understand this is exactly the kind of polemic I'm hoping to avoid. I'm looking for something a little more clinical and dispassionate.It is hard to speak of this issue because fireworks tend to go off upon its' mere mention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottieking Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 Marco, I teach this in a one week mini unit and I would suggest approaching the matter by researching the following topics in this order;Pre 20th CenturyThe history of the Jewish People pre DiasporaThe DiasporaThe History of the Palestinian PeopleThe History of Jerusalem (key piece of the puzzle)The History of Europeon Anti-SemitismBritish Imperialism focusing on the Middle East20th CenturyThe Balfour DeclarationEffects of WWI on the Middle EastJewish Immigration pre 1945After Effects of Jewish Emigration World Wide post WWIIThe Zionist Movement1947-1948 WarUN's original proposal for partitionThe Suez CrisisThe Seven Day War1972 Olympics (terrorist attacks)The Formation of the PLOCamp David TalksIsreal invasion of LebannonThe 1st infitadaand so onYou know what. I just realized you probably need a book which covers all of this. I wish I could lend you my Grade 11 world history text. Maybe your local library has it Twentieth Century Viewpointsor try here for a good consise (albeit a little outdated) explanation. Middle East Conflict Far from being an expert, I'll try to answer any questions if you have them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Evil_Mouse Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 I want to go back in time and have gone to Scottieking's classes!The only thing I would want to add to that, re. the longer history, is the Crusades, in large measure because it's one piece of history that's constantly evoked in the rhetoric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boochawan Posted June 29, 2006 Report Share Posted June 29, 2006 While it's definitely biased, The Case For Israel by Alan Dershowitz might be a good read.Aloha,BradI'd recommend Dershowitz's follow-up, "A Case for Peace" - it is not as entirely as biased as its predecessor, yet the flavour is definetly a lot more politically moderate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now