Dr. J Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 I've never written my member of Parliament before, but I have now.The current miscarriage of justice being carried out by the National Parole Board in the case of Robert Latimer I find to be ridiculous. Whether one agrees or disagrees with what he did, this man is not a menace to society and having him remain in prison serves no useful purpose.His lack of remorse says volumes about his character (his sister says he will not lie to get out), but absolutely nothing about the possibilty of him repeating his action.This attempt to hold him down until he says "Uncle" is childish bullying at it's worst. it serves no one well, not Latimer, not society, not the disabled.Like I said, I've never written my MP before but I did on this one.Maybe this should have been in the Politics Forum? Is there a Pissed Off forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark tonin Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 I remember following this case fairly closely over the years as it made its way through the court system (both the initial verdict and then the sentencing appeal).I've discussed this case with many students in high school law classes over the years, and the vast majority of them think that what he did was wrong, but that the sentence was far too severe for what he did. Most adults that I've talked with about this case over the years feel the same way. Therefore, I was shocked when I heard on the radio that he was denied day parole. Enough already!Peace, Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 I was watching the CBC news a few days ago and some of the people interviewed in the Latimer news piece implied that Latimer has said that he'd do it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchoulia Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 I, too, was appalled when I heard he was denied "day parole" (though I don't fully understand what that means). Right or wrong, he's paid his (in my opinion) questionable "debt" to society.I'm not condoning what he did..I can't even figure out how I truly feel about it..it's a difficult question and a slippery moral & legal slope..I know the purpose of the sentence was for its "deterrent" value, but I just think this guy and his family have suffered enough..and from what I can tell, he fully believes what he did was right and done purely from a place of love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phishtaper Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 ... implied that Latimer has said that he'd do it again. he has always stated that he felt what he did was the right thing to do. given the impossibility of it actually happening again, though, he should be released despite the legal requirement of showing remorse. very sad situation, all around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bagochips Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 The man has been in jail for about 15 years now. He is no threat to society or any individual. I believe the parole board is way off base in their decision to not grant him day parole (life in a half-way house vs staying in jail, SP). Meanwhile Karla roams the streets of Montreal ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchoulia Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 (life in a half-way house vs staying in jail, SP). Meanwhile Karla roams the streets of Montreal ...Thanks for the clarification.And that last fact you mentioned is, literally, nauseating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. J Posted December 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 ... implied that Latimer has said that he'd do it again. he has always stated that he felt what he did was the right thing to do. given the impossibility of it actually happening again' date=' though, he should be released despite the legal requirement of showing remorse. very sad situation, all around. [/quote']I agree. Given the same set of circumstances (a daughter whom he loved suffering immeasurable pain with no hope of getting better) Latimer has always said he would do the same thing over again. As his sister said - he's not going to lie to get out of jail.How many jackasses come before the Parole Board and lie thru their teeth and the Board knows full well they're only giving them what they want to hear and they still get parole....but Latimer (despite the miniscule possibility that he would ever re-offend) refuses to say what they want to hear so they continue to twist his arm a little tighter.The other night i happened to catch a PBS special on Dylan showcasing some early live footage. It struck me that this is the very kind of situation that in the early sixties Dylan would have ripped to shreds "The Ballad of Robert Latimer" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bagochips Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 "The Ballad of Robert Latimer" eh? Now if only you knew somebody who wrote songs, Dr. J. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. J Posted December 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 Now if only you knew somebody who wrote songs, Dr. J. ah yeah.....but he doesn't listen to me.....none of my children listen to me..... geeez i don't even think my member of Parliament listens to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Boy 2.0 Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 (edited) pretty roughRobert Latimer had a daughter named TraceyShe was born in the eighties at a time of great progressWith a cord wrapped around her neck oh so tightlyAnd any air that gave life was cut off in the processBut born she was and lived a life of great sufferingThe mind of a baby was to be her life sentenceAnd bedsores and seizures over and over againThe doctors thought surgeries would help with the pain But mutilation, incapacitation her father protestedAnd one day decided upon her final deathbedTo ease the pain and suffering of a belovedAnd hoped that in death her agony would be endedBut the authorities fumed and pointed and jailed himWhile knowing he loved her and that the weight that he carriedWould be with him always just like her memoryHe suffered and mourned and did his time bravelyAnd then one day his parole it came upHe asked for it humbly and had always thoughtThat for his actions his daughter would love himAnd on that point his parole was deniedThey wanted to hear that he was wrong not rightIn acting in the best interests of a loved oneFor her to live a life of suffering and pain was more justAnd his hopes for his freedom were thereby crushedAnd until that day he looks a judge in the eyeAnd with the laws of the land he compliesAnd admits to himself and to the worldThat he didn't do what was best for his girlHe'll sit in a prison with one thought on his mindThat justice can indeed be blindand has nothing to do with what's wrong and what's rightBut until the day that's changed he'll fight Edited December 7, 2007 by Guest added last stanza Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now