George W. Bush - Ottawa, Nov 30th!!

[Douglas]

hmmm... so my boss has been trying to organize a little "outing" for all of us to help bridge the gap between the downtowners and the pasturers...his grand idear was bowling (I can just see it now...balls being thrown across the allies instead of down them. Yikes). I would rather go to this with the colleagues...a pie in the face hurts much less than a bowling ball

[Schwa.]

Lets do a flash mob for this! Everyone show up just before Asswipe is supposed to come on and everyone moon him.....MOON HIM GOOD!!!!

[StoneMtn]

The following is a letter sent by "Lawyers Against the War", a group of which I am a member, to Paul Martin last week:

Friday, November 19, 2004

The Right Honourable Paul Martin

Prime Minister of Canada

Office of the Prime Minister

Langevin Block

80 Wellington Street

Ottawa, Canada K1A 0A2

Tel: 613 6868

Fax: 613-941-6900

Email: pm@pm.gc.ca

URGENT

Dear Prime Minister Martin:

It was with absolute dismay that we learned of the planned visit of President Bush to Canada on November 30th 2004.

Surely you are aware of the many grave crimes against humanity and war crimes for which President Bush stands properly accused by the world, starting with the Nuremberg Tribunal’s ‘supreme international crime’ of waging an aggressive war against Iraq in defiance of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and including systematic and massive violations of the Geneva Conventions Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War and Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, as well as the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. As recently as November 16, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights and former war crimes prosecutor Louise Arbour called for an investigation into crimes against the Geneva Conventions in the assault by US forces on the densely populated city of Fallujah.

The terrible toll in life and limb of these crimes was documented in a study carried out by the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health in Baltimore and published in the October 29, 2004 issue of the British Medical Journal The Lancet which conservatively estimated that the war had taken 100,000 Iraqi lives, mostly women and children. This was well within the range predicted before the war, for example by a British affiliate of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War who, in November 2002, assessed the probable death toll at a minimum of 48,000 deaths, mostly civilians, and predicted that post-war conditions would cost an additional 200,000 lives.

The President’s responsibility for these offences derives not only from his ‘command responsibility' as Commander in Chief of US forces, for crimes that he knew were being committed, or ignored through willful blindness, but did nothing to prevent; it also comes from his direct involvement in the formulation of policy. This includes his personal involvement not only in the devising and waging of an aggressive, illegal war, but also of the unlawful refusal to grant prisoner of war status to prisoners of war, contrary to specific provisions of the Geneva Conventions, an act repudiated in the US Courts. It also includes the approval of techniques of interrogation by his direct subordinate, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, that legally and morally constitute torture and that led directly to the disgraceful violence against Iraqi prisoners, for example at the prison at Abu Ghraib.

As you know, not only are these acts criminal under international law, but many of them are also criminal under Canadian law, under laws enacted in pursuance of our international obligations, most importantly the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, put in place just four years ago under a Liberal government. They also violate the provisions on torture in the Canadian Criminal Code.

By these laws, Canadians and non-Canadians alike are liable to prosecution in Canada, no matter where in the world they have committed their crimes. Furthermore, as the Attorney General can advise, the fact that these crimes have been committed by Mr. Bush while President of the United States is absolutely irrelevant to his personal liability to prosecution in Canada, according to principles established at Nuremberg and universally recognized since then, including by the British House of Lords in the Pinochet case in 1999. And if President Bush were to visit Canada after leaving office, we would be seeking the Attorney General’s permission under section 9 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act and section 7 of the Criminal Code to commence proceedings against him.

However, as you also know, should President Bush come to Canada now, while still President, he would be clothed with both diplomatic and head of state immunity from our laws and we would be powerless to bring him to justice.

Your invitation in these circumstances, therefore, shows contempt for both Canadian and international law and is a grievous insult to the literally hundreds of thousands of victims of President Bush’s international crimes. It is also our belief that the invitation endangers Canadians’ security at home and abroad, because it is a departure from our steadfast refusal to this point to participate in this criminal war of the Bush administration. In fact, it is our belief that this invitation can only act as an encouragement to President Bush in his continuing criminal activity, providing him with an important platform in this, his first post re-election foreign visit, to defend illegal US actions in Iraq and to improve his international standing despite them, all this against the wishes of the majority of Canadians.

Indeed, we feel bound to point out that your invitation to President Bush may thus constitute an abetting of the crimes he and his administration and military continue to commit. As such you and your colleagues could be personally liable to prosecution under the Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Act by virtue of section 21 of the Canadian Criminal Code, for crimes so serious that they are punishable in Canada by up to life imprisonment. Abetting a crime, as the Attorney General will advise, is regarded as equally criminal to actually committing it and is complete when one intentionally, knowingly, or with willful blindness encourages the commission of a crime by another.

Nor would President Bush’s immunity be capable of shielding you and your colleagues from prosecution, because, as the Attorney General will advise, the immunity applies only to foreign officials visiting Canada and not to members of the Canadian government itself. Nor does the inability to prosecute a criminal affect the criminal liability of an abettor.

It is for all these reasons we urgently request a meeting with you, the Foreign Minister, the Attorney General or your representatives in Ottawa, so that we might have the opportunity to elaborate on these matters and to persuade you to declare President Bush persona non grata in Canada, or at least to rescind this invitation, and thus to avoid implicating yourselves and Canada in the most serious of international crimes.

Sincerely,

Michael Mandel and Gail Davidson

on behalf of Lawyers against the War (LAW) a Canada-based committee of jurists and others with members in thirteen countries.

Contacts:

Michael Mandel, Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3. Tel: 416 736-5039, Fax: 416-736-5736,

Email: MMandel@osgoode.yorku.ca

Gail Davidson, Tel: 604 738 0338; Fax: 604 736 1175, Email: law@portal.ca

[bradm]

I can just see it now...balls being thrown across the allies instead of down them.

Typo of the week? I think you meant "alleys" here, but since Canada and U.S.A. generally do fight on the same side...

Aloha,

Brad

[paisley]

Canadians Go Into Action to Oppose Bush Visit!!

GET ON THE BUS FROM HAMILTON TO OTTAWA Nov 30/04!

Please note the following important correction: the buses will be returning to Wentworth House, Hamilton (same as departure point) at 2am and NOT Toronto.

*BOARDING for Departure: Tuesday, Nov 30/04 at 5:00 am at Wentworth House, McMaster University, Hamilton

*BOARDING for Return: Tuesday, Nov 30/04 at 8:00pm from Ottawa, arriving in Hamilton 2am, Wed Dec1/04 at Wentworth House, McMaster University

*Price: Total Round Trip $10 ONLY on Chartered Bus with comfortable seats for sleeping and washrooms

*PLEASE BOOK A PLACE ASAP SO WE KNOW HOW MANY BUSES TO GET. PHONE # REQUIRED FOR RESERVATION. PLEASE RSVP BY Monday, Nov 29/04

* CONTACT: McMasterSocialistMovement (at) gmail.com, Phone# 905-527-1114

DONATIONS WOULD BE APPRECIATED

People across Canada have gone into action to oppose the visit of George W. Bush to Canada from November 30-December 1. The No to Bush Committee in Ottawa is in the midst of organizing mass demonstrations and has planned for Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 12:00 noon, a rally at Confederation Park (corner of Elgin St and Laurier Ave) and at 5:00 pm, a rally Against War on Parliament Hill.

This visit is George W. Bush’s first international visit since his re-election on Nov 2. Since his re-election, the U.S. has already stepped up its attacks against Iraq with the recent assaults against Fullajah. It is also clear that the U.S. will more aggressively carry out its policy of "pre-emptive" war and foreign occupation as seen in Afghanistan, Iraq and the US support for the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands. Yet US imperial aggression spreads its destruction to every continent, from Asia to Latin America to practically every corner of the world.

At the same time, Prime Minister Paul Martin has announced that the Canadian government is carrying out a review of its foreign policy this fall. Canada's role internationally is an issue of great concern for many Canadians. In the name of participating in the "war on terror", Canada is participating in military and diplomatic actions that violate international law and go against the values of the majority of Canadians. The Canadian people must have a voice in this foreign policy review process.

For these reasons and many more, Canadians are taking a stand against Bush’s upcoming visit. We will show the Martin government that we oppose Canadian alliance with the Bush agenda. We will show the oppressed peoples of the world that we stand in solidarity with their struggles. We will show the US anti-war movement and war resisters our solidarity. We will show the world that Canada stands for justice, peace and the right of all peoples to self-determination and against the war crimes of the Bush administration.

ORGANIZERS & SPONSORS: McMaster Socialist Movement, McMaster Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights, McMaster NDP Club, Nov16-Coalition & Others

[Tonberry]

GM - I'm all for the 'treating this like a show' idea. Booked off work just for it. Yeeeehaw...

I'd do anything to get a picture of me and the world's greatest living monster together (proven, anyway... sorry, Ogopogo). Maybe that could be a goal?

[StoneMtn]

The following letter was just sent by Lawyers Against the War to our Minister of Citizenship and Immigration advising that Bush is not legally admissible to this country. Enjoy...

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

The Honourable Judy Sgro, P.C., M.P.

Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Ottawa Canada K1A 1L1

Tel: 1 613 954 1064

Fax: 1 613 957 2688

Minister@cic.gc.ca

sgro.j@parl.gc.ca

Dear Minister Sgro;

Re: President George W. Bush proposed November 30th 2004 visit to Canada.

We wrote to Prime Minister Martin on November 19 2004 protesting the invitation of President Bush to Canada on the grounds of the President’s flagrant commission of the most serious crimes against international law. Our letter is enclosed.

As that letter indicates, many of the crimes of which President Bush stands accused are crimes under Canadian law, specifically under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

We are writing to you now to remind you that these crimes render President Bush inadmissible to Canada under our immigration laws. Because responsibility for the operation and enforcement of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act lies with you and your Ministry, we are calling on you to advise the Prime Minister of this fact and to insist that he rescind this invitation out of respect for our laws.

As you know, section 35 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, 2001 2001 provides as follows:

35. (1) A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of violating human or international rights for

(a) committing an act outside Canada that constitutes an offence referred to in sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act;

Paragraph 2 of section 35 allows for exceptions to be made for other classes of inadmissible foreign nationals 'who satisf[y] the Minister that their presence in Canada would not be detrimental to the national interest.' However, these exceptions specifically do not apply to those who have committed acts constituting offences referred to in sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

Section 6 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act incorporates by reference all international crimes against humanity and war crimes, and, explicitly, all crimes enumerated in Articles 7 and 8(2) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Section 7 of the Act places special responsibility on ‘military commanders’ and other ‘superiors’ for crimes committed by their subordinates that they knew of, or were criminally negligent in failing to know of, and with respect to which they did not take necessary and reasonable steps to prevent.

Section 33 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act specifically provides that ‘facts that constitute inadmissibility under sections 34 to 37 include facts arising from omissions and, unless otherwise provided, include facts for which there are reasonable grounds to believe that they have occurred, are occurring or may occur.’

The evidence of President Bush’s past and ongoing criminality is overwhelming. A recent editorial in the Washington Post commented on some of the now well known facts regarding the chain of memoranda from the President and white house White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales, now Attorney General, that led to the use of torture by the US Armed Forces. These memoranda clearly establish the President’s culpability for the torture used on detainees at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib prisons. We also refer you to the many careful reports prepared by respected human rights organizations, journalists and scholars and also to recent decisions by US Courts, some of which are referenced in our letter to the Prime Minister and others we have listed below. These clearly provide far more than ‘reasonable grounds to believe’ in President Bush’s legal and moral responsibility for the gravest crimes under numerous provisions of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

We are sending a copy of this letter directly to the Interdepartmental Operations Group (IOG), the agency through which, we have been given to understand, Citizenship and Immigration Canada, the Department of Justice and the RCMP investigate all allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes.

We remind you of the proud claim made by Canada’s War Crimes Program in its 2003-2004 report that,

The policy of the Government of Canada is unequivocal. Canada will not be a safe haven for persons involved in war crimes, crimes against humanity or other reprehensible acts.

The time is short before President Bush’s intended visit, so we are asking that you or your representative meet with us immediately to explain the action you intend to fulfill your obligations under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Sincerely,

Michael Mandel and Gail Davidson

on behalf of Lawyers against the War (LAW) a Canada-based committee of jurists and others with members in thirteen countries.

cc. Interdepartmental Operations Group, war_crimes-crimes_de_guerre@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Contacts:

Michael Mandel, Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3. Tel: 416 736-5039, Fax: 416-736-5736,

Email: MMandel@osgoode.yorku.ca

Gail Davidson, Tel: 604 738 0338; Fax: 604 736 1175, Email: law@portal.ca

SELECTED LIST OF REPORTS DOCUMENTING CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES FOR WHICH PRESIDENT BUSH IS CRIMINALLY REPSONSIBLE

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, Report Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq http://hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/usa1203.pdf

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

Report, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Human dignity denied Torture and accountability in the ‘war on terror’ http://hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1203/usa1203.pdf

MDE 16/11/2004 Iraq: Urgent action needed to prevent war crimes

MDE 14/057/2004 12/11/2004 Iraq: Fears of serious violations of the rules of war in Falluja

MDE 14/055/2004 04/11/2004 Iraq - Falluja: assurances needed for the protection of civilians

MDE 14/049/2004 17/09/2004 Iraq: Urgent inquiry needed into civilian killings by US troops

MDE 14/043/2004 30/07/2004 Iraq: Violence must stop - rule of law must prevail

AMR 51/102/2004 18/06/2004 Iraq: Clarification needed on status of prisoners after 30 June Open letter to the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations

NWS 21/005/2004 28/05/2004 Iraq: Incommunicado detention/Fear of torture, Mohammad Jassem 'Abd al-'Issawi

MDE 14/027/2004 28/05/2004 Open letter to state members of the Coalition in Iraq

MDE 14/021/2004 11/05/2004 Iraq: Killings of civilians in Basra and al-'Amara

MDE 14/007/2004 11/05/2004 Iraq: Civilians killed by UK Armed Forces and armed groups

MDE 14/019/2004 07/05/2004 An open letter to President George W. Bush on the question of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment

AMR 51/078/2004 07/05/2004 USA: Pattern of brutality and cruelty -- war crimes at Abu Ghraib

ORG 10/004/2004 30/04/2004 Iraq: Torture not isolated -- independent investigations vital

MDE 14/001/2004 04/03/2004 Iraq: Incommunicado detention/Fear of torture

MDE 14/179/2003 20/11/2003 Iraq: Amnesty International seeks clarification on house demolitions by US troops in Iraq

MDE 14/177/2003

MDE 14/101/2003 25/04/2003 Iraq: Stripped naked and humiliated by US soldiers

MDE 14/078/2003 08/04/2003 Iraq: Civilians under fire.

MDE 14/071/2003 08/04/2003 Iraq: Civilians under fire

MDE 14/072/2003 03/04/2003 Iraq: Condemnation of British use of cluster bombs

IOR 41/011/2003 02/04/2003 Iraq: Use of cluster bombs -- Civilians pay the price

IOR 41/010/2003 01/04/2003 Iraq: US must investigate civilian deaths

MDE 14/058/2003 30/03/2003 Iraq: In the shadow of war: backlash against human rights

MDE 14/056/2003 27/03/2003 Iraq: Risk to civilians if landmines and cluster bombs used

MDE 14/045/2003 26/03/2003 Iraq: Fear of war crimes by both sides

MDE 14/044/2003 26/03/2003 Iraq: Bombing of Iraqi state television

RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES ACT.

OFFENCES OUTSIDE CANADA

6. (1) Every person who, either before or after the coming into force of this section, commits outside Canada

…

( a crime against humanity, or

© a war crime,

is guilty of an indictable offence and may be prosecuted for that offence in accordance with section 8.

(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.

Punishment

(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)

(a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the basis of the offence; and

( is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.

Definitions

(3) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.

"crime against humanity" means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

…

"war crime" means an act or omission committed during an armed conflict that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a war crime according to customary international law or conventional international law applicable to armed conflicts, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

(4) For greater certainty, crimes described in articles 6 and 7 and paragraph 2 of article 8 of the Rome Statute are, as of July 17, 1998, crimes according to customary international law, and may be crimes according to customary international law before that date. This does not limit or prejudice in any way the application of existing or developing rules of international law.

ARTICLE 7

Crimes against humanity

1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

(a) murder;

…

(e) imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;

(f) torture;

(g) rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;

…

(i) enforced disappearance of persons;

(k) other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack;

…

(e) "torture" means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions;

…

(i) "enforced disappearance of persons" means the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time.

PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 8

War crimes

2. For the purpose of this Statute, "war crimes" means:

(a) grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention:

(i) wilful killing;

(ii) torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;

(iii) wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health;

(iv) extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;

…

(vi) wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial;

(vii) unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement;

( other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:

(i) intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

(ii) intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives;

…

(iv) intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;

…

(vi) killing or wounding a combatant who, having laid down his arms or having no longer means of defence, has surrendered at discretion;

…

(ix) intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;

…

(xi) killing or wounding treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army;

…

(xiv) declaring abolished, suspended or inadmissible in a court of law the rights and actions of the nationals of the hostile party;

…

(xxi) committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;

…

(xxv) intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions;

[As a result of Security Council Resolution 1546 of 8 June 2004, it is arguable that the conflict ceased as of that day to be 'of an international character'. In that case, crimes committed from that day forward would fall under the following provisions:]

© in the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause:

(i) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(ii) committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment;

…

(e) other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in armed conflicts not of an international character, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts:

(i) intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;

(ii) intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law;

…

(iv) intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;

…

(vi) committing rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, as defined in article 7, paragraph 2(f), enforced sterilization, and any other form of sexual violence also constituting a serious violation of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions;

…

(ix) killing or wounding treacherously a combatant adversary;

…

(f) paragraph 2(e) applies to armed conflicts not of an international character and thus does not apply to situations of internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence or other acts of a similar nature. It applies to armed conflicts that take place in the territory of a State when there is protracted armed conflict between governmental authorities and organized armed groups or between such groups.

[President Bush’s ‘command responsibility derives from the following provisions of Section 6 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act:]

Breach of responsibility by military commander

7. (1) A military commander commits an indictable offence if

(a) the military commander, outside Canada,

(i) fails to exercise control properly over a person under their effective command and control or effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 4, or

(ii) fails, before or after the coming into force of this section, to exercise control properly over a person under their effective command and control or effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 6;

( the military commander knows, or is criminally negligent in failing to know, that the person is about to commit or is committing such an offence; and

© the military commander subsequently

(i) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to prevent or repress the commission of the offence, or the further commission of offences under section 4 or 6, or

(ii) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.

Breach of responsibility by a superior

(2) A superior commits an indictable offence if

(a) the superior, outside Canada,

(i) fails to exercise control properly over a person under their effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 4, or

(ii) fails, before or after the coming into force of this section, to exercise control properly over a person under their effective authority and control, and as a result the person commits an offence under section 6;

( the superior knows that the person is about to commit or is committing such an offence, or consciously disregards information that clearly indicates that such an offence is about to be committed or is being committed by the person;

© the offence relates to activities for which the superior has effective authority and control; and

(d) the superior subsequently

(i) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to prevent or repress the commission of the offence, or the further commission of offences under section 4 or 6, or

(ii) fails to take, as soon as practicable, all necessary and reasonable measures within their power to submit the matter to the competent authorities for investigation and prosecution.

Conspiracy, attempt, etc.

(2.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) or (2) is guilty of an indictable offence.

Jurisdiction

…

Punishment

(4) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1), (2) or (2.1) is liable to imprisonment for life.

Definitions

(6) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.

"military commander" includes a person effectively acting as a military commander and a person who commands police with a degree of authority and control comparable to a military commander.

"superior" means a person in authority, other than a military commander.

[Vermontdave]

I'm drunk and thinking.

I thought that if you've gotten a drunk driving conviction in the states, it bars you from entering Canada.

King George II has never been to Vermont. Rove and co. know it wouldn't be pretty.

Go Ottawa! Show these assholes what the rest of the world thinks.

My money is on him not showin.

I wish the 600 Vermont Guard who just left, a safe return.

peace

[StoneMtn]

So, it looks like the Canadian voice is being heard. Bush has learned that all of you Skancs will be waiting for him in Ottawa, and has decided to cut that trip short to go to Halifax. So, Halifax people; we're counting on you to get out there and protest this bastard! See the following article (in which I note the Washington Times seems to think that talking about Ottawa = being "on location" in Toronto):

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

TORONTO - President Bush won't have to rescue his Secret Service bodyguards during his upcoming visit to Canada as he did recently in Chile, Canadian

security officials said.

But with thousands of protesters expected to demonstrate against Mr. Bush, the White House decided to cut short his visit to Ottawa and travel to

Halifax instead.

Mr. Bush is expected to be in Canada on Tuesday and Wednesday on his first official visit to the country since his re-election.

In Canada, Mr. Bush is considered the least popular U.S. president in recent history, and anti-Bush protesters of all stripes and political persuasions

are planning massive rallies in the capital, Ottawa.

Tens of thousands are expected to brave the cold to protest Mr. Bush's policies in the Middle East and the proposed missile-defense program.

Even the Canadian Parliament wasn't considered a safe enough ground by White House officials.

Stephen Harper, who leads the Conservative Party and is the head of the official opposition, speculated Wednesday that Mr. Bush declined to address

the Parliament for fear of heckling by members of left-wing opposition parties.

But Canadian security officials said there would be no repeat of the Saturday incident in Chile, when Mr. Bush had to intervene to stop a shoving

match between Chilean security officials and Secret Service agents who were accompanying him to a state dinner.

Chilean security had tried to stop several members of Mr. Bush's security detail from accompanying him to a dinner with the Asia-Pacific Economic

Cooperation summit's 21 leaders.

"This won't happen in Canada," said Cpl. Monique Beauchamp, spokeswoman for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), Canada's national police force.

Cpl. Beauchamp said that although the RCMP has the primary responsibility for protecting visiting dignitaries, it does so in collaboration with other

federal agencies and foreign partners, including the Secret Service.

But Cpl. Beauchamp would not say whether Mr. Bush's bodyguards would be allowed to accompany him during the meetings with Canadian officials or

whether they would be permitted to pack their guns.

"You can understand that for obvious security reasons, we cannot discuss any operational details," Cpl. Beauchamp said.

An RCMP officer who was part of the top security detail during the 2001 Summit of the Americas in Quebec City said his force and the Secret Service

have excellent working relations.

"These are very carefully planned and choreographed events," said the officer, on the condition of anonymity. "We have protocols, zones. Everybody

knows where one side leaves and the other takes over."

Canadian officials are stepping up security measures ahead of Mr. Bush's visit. Ottawa municipal police and the Ontario Provincial Police are working

on plans for the visit, officials said. Security at the borders and the airports also has been tightened.

Details of Mr. Bush's itinerary were expected to be confirmed by the White House yesterday, but in an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corp.,

Nova Scotia Premier John Hamm said his officials were told to prepare for Mr. Bush's arrival.

Mr. Bush is expected to deliver a belated thank you to Nova Scotians for their hospitality after the September 11 terrorist attacks. Forty-four

U.S.-bound planes were diverted to the Halifax airport when the airspace over the United States was shut down after the attacks. About 8,000 stranded

passengers stayed in hotels, community centers and the homes of local residents until the planes were allowed to continue on their journeys.

Many Canadians felt snubbed when Mr. Bush failed to mention their country in his thank-you address after September 11.

Federal Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Geoff Regan, the ranking Liberal minister from the Maritimes, said he hopes Nova Scotians extend a "gracious"

welcome to Mr. Bush. Mr. Regan added that he doesn't expect large protests.