it would seem to me (though i am uneducated in this!) that nowadays, since you don't actually have to sign, but the waiver is simply stated on the lift ticket (ie. buying the lift ticket is equivalent to accepting the waiver) that it would be easier to sue, not more difficult? i mean, nobody actually reads the back of the lift ticket. Quote: There are alarms to detect safety problems. If there is something wrong with the chair as it leaves the station, the grip force alarm goes off. It is standard equipment. At Quicksilver, one was constantly misfiring going off twenty times a day, so loud that skiers could hear. Paper was stuffed in it to quiet it down. The president of Whistler believes that the BC government would not have allowed them to operate if it wasn't safe. But the government relied on Whistler to fix the lift. Whistler relied on the engineer who certified the lift who was on the payroll of the US manufacturers. As for code violations, they were no secret according to the coroner. He has stated in his report that Whistler Mountain, the Government of British Columbia Inspection Bureau, and the lift manufacturer were aware that there were sections of the code to which this lift did not comply. There were two incidents which he feels should have prompted a more thorough investigation. Three weeks earlier, two empty chairs fell from the cable near tower 21, the same spot as the fatal accident. Nine months earlier another empty chair plunged 75 feet from the same cable at the same point. Much to the surprise of skiers on the lift. Although wind may have been a factor in the first incident, the second time grips simply could not hold at the steepest angle - steeper than the lift was designed for.