He certainly may have been, but the title of the song contains nothing (i.e., no thing, no specific word or words) that refers to that activity. I claim it's invalid to state that he must have been referring to "this" specific activity, simply because he didn't refer to any specific activity; it's assumptive and unprovable, except by listening to the song. (But this theme isn't about and in no way involves the songs themselves*, it's about their titles.) Nope, I'm just saying those titles didn't meet the definition, as written, of theme. Aloha, Brad * Except for the usual rules about having been on an official release, etc.