hamilton Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 (edited) Don't recall seeing this here yet... You should probably click here. Edit to add: these are the UK versions, as opposed to the US versions, which were reissued in two separate boxed sets in the last couple of years (but which are unavailable individually). Edited May 3, 2006 by Guest Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booche Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I'll take 'Hello. Albums I dont own' for 400$ Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamilton Posted May 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I know for a fact that secondtube has been waiting for the remasters to come out before he purchases any Beatles albums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimmyB Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I hope they are not copy controlled?Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
payce-ley Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 more cowbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bouche Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Didn't this happen in the late eighties for Compact Disc release? How many more times will I have to buy the fucking Beatles? Helloooooooo BIT TORRENT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey Boy 2.0 Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 fecking michael jackson trying to pay off his lawyers scheme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Didn't this happen in the late eighties for Compact Disc release? How many more times will I have to buy the fucking Beatles? Helloooooooo BIT TORRENT!The Beatles catalogue already sounds as good or better than anything on the market thanks to the excellent mastering. Secondtube waited and wasted years for nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcO Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Didn't this happen in the late eighties for Compact Disc release? How many more times will I have to buy the fucking Beatles? Helloooooooo BIT TORRENT!I don't get the "how many more times will I have to buy the fucking Beatles" comment.The UK catalogue has only been released on CD once: in 1987. I'd say waiting 19 years for a remastering project was far too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenenbaum Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 can't wait to ride the pig on this one!giddy-up Oink!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bouche Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I don't get the "how many more times will I have to buy the fucking Beatles" comment.The UK catalogue has only been released on CD once: in 1987. I'd say waiting 19 years for a remastering project was far too long.What wasn't released in North America? If you're talking album covers and certain song combinations, sure they're different, but everything was released.I'm merely commenting on yet another release of the same thing that I've already bought on vinyl, and CD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I don't get the "how many more times will I have to buy the fucking Beatles" comment.The UK catalogue has only been released on CD once: in 1987. I'd say waiting 19 years for a remastering project was far too long.What wasn't released in North America? If you're talking album covers and certain song combinations' date=' sure they're different, but everything was released.I'm merely commenting on yet another release of the same thing that I've already bought on vinyl, and CD.[/quote']As the DVD buying geeks would say: Double-dipping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booche Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Jackson to Sell Beatles Catalog Embattled pop star wards off bankruptcy Michael Jackson has restructured his finances to avoid declaring bankruptcy, his attorneys said yesterday in a statement. Although the deal's details have not been disclosed, Jackson will reportedly be selling half of his share of the Sony/ATV catalog -- with its significant share of the Beatles' recordings, as well as songs by Neil Diamond, Roy Orbison, Bob Dylan and others -- to Sony Corp., according to the New York Times. Jackson took out a $270 million loan from Bank of America, to continue to fund his wildly expensive lifestyle. The bank then sold the loan to Fortress Investment Group. As Jackson's trial on child molestation charges was about to begin early last year (he was acquitted last summer), his financial advisors reportedly began pressuring the singer to sell a significant share of the Sony catalog on order to pay off his mounting debts.According to the Times' unnamed sources close to the deal, proceeds from Jackson's sale of twenty-five percent of the catalog would go towards paying off Jackson's debt to Fortress, who would in turn offer the pop star a lower interest rate on the loan. Jackson purchased half of the catalog in 1985 for $47.5 million, and it is now valued at $1 billion.Sony has been in negotiations with Jackson and his representatives for some time now to broker a deal that would prevent the artist from declaring bankruptcy. If bankrupt, Jackson's half of the Sony/ATV catalog would be auctioned off, potentially pitting Sony against other companies in an all-out bidding war.After his acquittal in June, Jackson relocated to Bahrain, trailed by rumors of serious financial troubles, and shuttered his Neverland California ranch last month.He is currently at work on a new single with R. Kelly, Wyclef Jean and other artists. No official release date for the single, or a new studio album, has been set.ALEX MARPosted Apr 14, 2006 3:57 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Low Roller Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Anybody else see the irony of Micheal Jackson working together with R. Kelly, or is it just me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradm Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 I didn't so much see irony as I did feel creepony*, but, yeah, your displeasure is felt over here as well.Aloha,Brad* A word I just created, whose meaning encapsulates "creepedoutedness". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now