Swan Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 (edited) So its finaly offical. The boys are back with David Lee Roth in tow. I don't know how it will sound but I've always wanted to see a Diamond Dave performance.The Toronto date is scheduled for October 7th at the ACC. Only 25 dates have been announced so far. Tickets go on sale this Saturday thru livenation.com Edited August 13, 2007 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamilton Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Did Michael Anthony come back, or will they be using Eddie's son again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradm Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Did Michael Anthony come back, or will they be using Eddie's son again?Eddit's son, Wolfgang, will be playing bass.http://www.jambase.com/headsup.asp?storyID=11169Apparently he also chose the (25-song) set list.Aloha,Brad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewRider Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 "I BROUGHT MYYYYYY PEEEEEEEEENNNNNCCCCCCCCIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLL....." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanada Kev Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 I'm your ice cream man ... this should be fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chameleon Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 I'm on this for sure! Too bad about Michael Anthony. I would have love to see that JD bass all sweaty and ready! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boiler Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 "I BROUGHT MYYYYYY PEEEEEEEEENNNNNCCCCCCCCIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLL....."Give me something to write on........... man.I've always liked Diamnod Dave, but let's face it Hagger was the man. He was a musician, Roth is a clown er I mean entertainer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blane Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 as much as it might be fun for a nostalgia trip, I'm not sure I'd invest. I actually liked van halen a lot when I was in my early teens learning to play guitar. Caught Van Hagar about 15 years ago, which already felt a bit like a nostalgia trip, but was still a lot of fun. Maybe I'll keep the good memories of that instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Mike Anthony added sooo much to Van Halen's sound. It won't be the same without him. Forget his bass. Mike's vocals are dominant on virtually every song. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freak By Night Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 (edited) I'm with you Jaimoe. If that kid can't sing like Mike Anthony, the music's gonna suck.edit to add: Van Halen was one of the first concerts I ever went to. It was 1980 and "Women and Children First" had just come out. One of my favourite concerts ever. Edited August 14, 2007 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Wolfgang is kinda freaky looking. I realize that Eddie and Valerie are twins, but Wolfgang looks like a pudgy-faced version of his mother pre-fad diet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chameleon Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Mike Anthony added sooo much to Van Halen's sound. It won't be the same without him. Forget his bass. Mike's vocals are dominant on virtually every song.Agreed the vocal harmonies are key. I am sure they will hire a backup singer for those. No biggie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 It is a biggie to old fans. Mimic isn't duplication. Anthony also brought in an attitute that can't be replaced by a teenager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chameleon Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 I agree, obviously it would be more complete with Anthony, but I do not think it will derail the entire process without him. He is perhaps he only original member that could be absent and have the tour continue.I too love the old Van Halen, and I am still unclear as to why Anthony wouldn't want to do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanada Kev Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 More like why the Halen bros didn't want to include him. I'd be surprised if this tour doesn't fall apart again before it starts ... or at least by the second week in. As much as I want to go, i'm not getting a ticket ahead of time from Tbastard and then having to deal with a refund (minus conveniences) because Eddie or Alex have a hissy fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chameleon Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 From what I heard/read on the net (which is by no means 100% solid). It was Michael Anthony that turned down the tour idea before it even started. I understood it that he did not want to tour.Ultimately I think they should all just let by gones be by gones and tour as a full unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwe333 Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 It is a biggie to old fans. Mimic isn't duplication. Anthony also brought in an attitute that can't be replaced by a teenager. At least the audience won't have to sit through MA's 'bass solo', Ode to a Flanger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velvet Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 I agree that it won't be the same without Michael, but I gotta say his live bass solo slot is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schwa. Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 if it was Hagar i might have maybe perhaps tentatively thought about considering seeing them. No Hagar and no Anthony makes Homer something something...NOT go crazy?Don't mind if i don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ike Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 I too was a Van Halen fan back in the day. I remember sometime around the 5150 period that I actually had every album on vinyl. Wish I still did.I'm a little curious to what the new band will sound like. I read somewhere that young Wolfgang has certainly inherited the Van Halen gene and can certainly rip it up on the bass. Sure I'd rather see the original lineup but this new one might be pretty cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chameleon Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 if it was Hagar i might have maybe perhaps tentatively thought about considering seeing them. No Hagar and no Anthony makes Homer something something...NOT go crazy?Don't mind if i don't.I never like Hagar or his voice. It always sounded strained and he did not have the bravado or showmanship of Diamond Dave.For me I am the other way around I would not consider seeing Halen without David Lee Roth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freak By Night Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 I've seen both versions of VH in concert (I don't think the version with Gary Cherone should be counted) and I enjoyed both concerts equally.I've always contended that it's the backing vocals that really make Van Halen's sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted August 15, 2007 Report Share Posted August 15, 2007 The longer Sammy recorded with the band, the more the music became generic or predictable. Sammy had the least imput into 5150 and it's the best Van Hagar album. It trickles down a slope from there regarding Hagar's collaboration; e.g., OU812 is second best and so on. David Lee is a fucking jackass bluegrass hack, but one hell of a frontman. One of the greats in modern rock history. Unfortuately, he's done his best to tarnish his own legacy with repeated bad career moves and own self loathing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chameleon Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 The longer Sammy recorded with the band, the more the music became generic or predictable. Sammy had the least imput into 5150 and it's the best Van Hagar album. It trickles down a slope from there regarding Hagar's collaboration; e.g., OU812 is second best and so on. David Lee is a fucking jackass bluegrass hack, but one hell of a frontman. One of the greats in modern rock history. Unfortuately, he's done his best to tarnish his own legacy with repeated bad career moves and own self loathing. I agree with you that the more Hagar sang with VH the more generic they became.. I do however think David Lee Roth has two bitchin' solo albums that are full of humour, great covers and some killer playing by Steve Via and others... Crazy from the Heat... and... Eat 'em and smile... I also think David Lee Roth has a better voice than Hagar....at least in his prime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esau. Posted August 16, 2007 Report Share Posted August 16, 2007 From what I heard/read on the net (which is by no means 100% solid). It was Michael Anthony that turned down the tour idea before it even started. I understood it that he did not want to tour.Ultimately I think they should all just let by gones be by gones and tour as a full unit.Well, that may be the case for this tour, although doubtful in my opinion. But when interviewed in february 2006 about the 2004 reunion, Michael had this to say about it:Published in Japan, Burrn! magazine"I was not going to just sit home and do nothing and that kind of upset the VAN HALEN brothers for whatever reason I can't understand myself. But basically when this whole reunion thing started Ed really didn't want me to be part of it. I don't know how he was going to call it a reunion (laughs) but I basically had to work out a deal with Irving Azoff's management company in order to be part of this thing. I kind of sucked it up a bit and I made less money but the way I looked at it was, if this possibly was the last tour that VAN HALEN would ever do then I'd be kicking myself because I wasn't a part of it and I want to be a part of it, even more so than the money so I sucked it all up and came on and did it. I did it for the fans."Source: http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news.aspx?mode=Article&newsitemID=49721 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now