Hal Johnson Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Go Canes!!So is it the rule, then, that it's only a goal if you can see white between the puck and the goal line? Cuz that call was pretty shitty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Low Roller Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 If the ref calls it a no-goal initially, the video replay must clearly show a goal to overturn the decision. The goal judges obviously could not prove without a shadow of a doubt that the red line and puck atoms were not touching, so no-goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal Johnson Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 The goal judges obviously could not prove without a shadow of a doubt that the red line and puck atoms were not touching, so no-goal.haha, awesome. I hate instant replay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c-towns Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 fack, weak 4th goal let in...far from over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peipunk Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Alexander Ovechkin = God of Hockey right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 What was Bob Cole drinking? I believe he said on Crosby's last goal that the "puck went off his [Varlamov]fat face and in."He also said the Caps won the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Low Roller Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Did you see Kunitz cross-check Varlamov in the neck just before Crosby scored his third goal?? BRUTAL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimoe Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Did you see Ruutu's antics in the Canada-Finn game today? He's a pathetic joke. He should hang out with Rivaldo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 What was Bob Cole drinking? I believe he said on Crosby's last goal that the "puck went off his [Varlamov]fat face and in."He also said the Caps won the series.He also said the Caps had won the game with 4.5 minutes left in the game. I was hoping the Pens would come back to make him look like an ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Did you see Ruutu's antics in the Canada-Finn game today? He's a pathetic joke. He should hang out with Rivaldo.I saw his antics on TSN this morning. What an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal Johnson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 What was Bob Cole drinking? I believe he said on Crosby's last goal that the "puck went off his [Varlamov]fat face and in."hahahaha, I thought he said that too. He must have meant to say mask or back (of head) and then changed direction mid-word. Gotta love Cole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal Johnson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Did you see Kunitz cross-check Varlamov in the neck just before Crosby scored his third goal?? BRUTAL!He barely touched him. And kudos to Varlamov for sticking with the play and not flopping like 90% of the goalies in the league would in the same situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Yeah bang fucking on Hal. Barely grazed him.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubberdinghy Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Now if that had been Patrick Roy or Dom Hasek, mask would have come flying off, trapper and blocker into the stands....I love that Varlamov kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubberdinghy Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Yeah, super cheap shot from Kunitz but the kid took it. Still a penalty in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal Johnson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 The way penalties are called these days, that probably should have been a penalty.I just get sick of everyone jumping on the "He needs to be suspended" bandwagon lately (not that anyone here said that, just the internet in general). It's fuckin hockey, these boys are tough, and I GUARANTEE the little play did not hurt Varlamov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Low Roller Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 It looks like Kunitz grazed the mask and didn't hit just bare neck thankfully. Varlamov has been phenomenal so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I doubt he'll get suspended and I'm leaning towards I don't think he should because that was cheap but not viscous (2 minutes for sure though) buuuuuuuuut I don't necessarily agree with how suspensions are called - he got hurt, suspension or well he got hit to head, intentionally with a stick, but luckily didn't get hurt - no suspension. Ultimately they're not addressing intent but only looking at result. Luck is playing a huge factor. I don't know really, tough issue. The NFL will suspend a guy for helmet to helmet on a QB even if the QB stays in the game and isn't injured and NFL players are pretty fucking tough.Really I just posted the video to clarify that he more than barely touched him. The whole suspension debate is a huge can of worms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booche Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 I guess there is one thing we can all agree on. Hal Johnson is officially the new Low Roller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubberdinghy Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 How Joller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal Johnson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 IF you weenies ever played hockey you'd know the difference between a suspendable act, and something that just happens in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 IF you weenies ever played hockey you'd know the difference between a suspendable act, and something that just happens in the game. I'm confused, who's saying anyone should be suspended? Maybe Hal is the new Roller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal Johnson Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Allright. I should quit while Im behind.But I wont.He barely grazed him and the hockey audience is getting soft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSloth Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 God bless you Hal. At least you're not getting soft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now