Jay, you seem to be arguing for both sides, and then getting defensive when someone argues one of the sides. It's also getting a bit 'personal' considering the topic is about Grisman, and for what I know, I, nor anyone else on the board have a 1 degree relation to the guy... And in terms of the democracy, that's exactly what we are doing. We have the right to make a personal judgement! If you can hustle someone to pay for your art... all the power to you, But if your art is duplicated and mass produced, I don't think there is anything inherent in the mass production that you have a right to 'a piece' of. But once again, if you can convince someone to pay, Respect. I just think something like this will go on to further hurt the Dawgs bottom line, as opposed to helping it, which I think is what he ultimately wants to accomplish.