I figure the most positive thing coming out of this debate, is the fact that it is indicative (hopefully) of some decision-makers finally seeking to brainstorm interventions aimed at addressing or at least acknowledging a very serious problem without focusing exclusively on the "need for tougher gun laws and criminal punishments". Although I am VERY skeptical that this is the best approach (e.g. perhaps Afrocentric classes offered within existing public schools and accessible to the general population vs. a distinct school altogether would be a more appropriate response), atleast things like education, positive identities, role models/mentorship, culturally/socially relevant content, etc. are "beginning" to enter into the realm of issues that actually need to be addressed if some of the problems plaguing Toronto's inner city are to be grappled with in any effective manner. How's that for a run-on sentence? I figure that the money it would cost to build separate schools that are able to accommodate these new programs could probably be put to more effective use. I'd be curious to here more about the existence/quality of social services and mentoring programs that are being offered in a "proactive" manner and targetted at vulnerable youth within the existing school system. I suspect a lot more money could be poured into beefing up programs that would "help" to alleviate the effects of poverty, and/or equip at least some students with better knowledge and ideally a sense of agency, or at the very least provide more positive and meaningful opportunities/alternatives for youth to pass their time?